Graduating to public service - is it affordable?

It's the season of commencements, and of career choices. Accept a government or nonprofit job at $40,000 a year, or become a management consultant and earn $100,000? Increasingly, public-spirited graduates of top colleges and policy schools are opting for the money.

In a tight labor market, public and nonprofit agencies are having difficulty attracting and retaining qualified professionals. From the military to the Securities and Exchange Commission, from urban schools to day-care providers, employers face steep challenges in fielding staffs capable of addressing their important public missions. Even at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, one-third of my classmates plan on entering the private sector next year.

The reasons are clear. Not only do jobs in public service typically pay far less; government has also suffered a dramatic loss of respect over recent decades. Perceived to be inefficient and ineffective, many service professions are struggling despite the growth of nonprofit entities as a partial substitute for government. Nonprofit and public employers who offer salaries well below those available elsewhere can't depend on worthy organizational missions to attract young employees. A two-year Kennedy School degree costs more than $60,000, and the average graduate accrues some $30,000 in loan debt. For many, idealism can't compete with the reality of student loans, combined with expectations of starting a family or simply living in a high-cost metropolitan area. Public service involves sacrifice, but self-sacrifice alone won't induce the supply of public servants to meet the demand for their skills.

A sense of disillusionment, even guilt, troubles many choosing the private route. Those who pursue public service often see their passion diluted by resignation. While a certain core of exceptionally dedicated or affluent young professionals will always choose the public path, for the balance of well-educated idealists glaring marketplace disparities can be a deterrent.

Some responsibility lies with public and nonprofit employers. Beyond improving workplace environments and aiming to provide private-caliber training and support, they should become more aggressively savvy in recruiting - starting earlier each year instead of allowing consulting firms to woo students first. And financial incentives for people entering the public sector should be a priority. Taxpayers should agree to finance more competitive salaries to attract sufficient numbers of high-quality government workers. Finally, philanthropy can help narrow the disparity in private versus nonprofit salaries. Donors to organizations must recognize that, as in business, talented staff is worth paying for.

*Josiah H. Brown is a master of public policy student at Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government.

(c) Copyright 2000. The Christian Science Publishing Society

Share this story:

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK