Bucking the Bar's Benchmarks
Law schools challenge the standards for getting a seal of approval
If Shawn Landry could do it over again, he might not attend the upstart Massachusetts School of Law - though he says he got a great education at an even greater price.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
He praises MSL for its professors' practical experience in court. He loved the small night classes and individual attention. He still owes $35,000 in loans, but that's only half what many of his friends racked up at other Massachusetts law schools. His one problem with MSL? It is not accredited by the American Bar Association. Without that ABA stamp of approval, Mr. Landry cannot take the Florida bar exam to become a practicing lawyer in the Sunshine State, where he and his family live. So he may move back to Massachusetts - one of only three states where new MSL graduates can take the state bar exam.
As in decades past, ABA accreditation is the crowning achievement of law schools. Attaining it requires close attention to such factors as faculty-student ratios and other minutiae like the number of seats available in the school law library. Without it, a law school's grads can't take the bar exam in most states.
Yet, in a remarkably swift turnaround, many schools now argue that "one-size-fits-all" ABA standards exclude innovative, low-cost law schools like MSL and actually hurt the quality of legal education in America. In the past four years, an increasingly noisy movement challenging ABA accreditation standards has grown far beyond the gadfly Massachusetts School of Law to include blue-chip institutions.
Debate has now reached the US Department of Education, and the ABA faces possible loss of federal recognition as an accrediting body. Much hangs on how the department and its advisory bodies receive a key ABA report due Sept. 1. Even if the ABA retains federal recognition, the challenge may profoundly change accrediting rules.
How the ABA got into such hot water is partly the story of a David-and-Goliath encounter. It is also the story of an organization that managed to alienate a key constituency - the deans of many ABA-accredited law schools.
There are 182 ABA-accredited law schools and more than 40 other law schools - including MSL - that are not ABA-accredited. Only Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Vermont permit MSL grads to take the bar exam immediately upon graduation. Graduates of ABA accredited schools may take a bar exam in any state.
That's not fair, says MSL Dean Lawrence Velvel. ABA rules, geared to big schools, have helped boost the average cost of a legal education to $60,000, he and others say.
Of course, Mr. Velvel's 10-year-old school has already flouted many of the ABA's most cherished rules to keep tuition at just $10,800 a year. Its 60,000-volume library is less than half the ABA-prescribed size - though MSL argues everything students need is online. The school has no campus - just a modern (if Spartan) office building in Andover, Mass. The ABA cited it for an "inadequate physical plant," Velvel says. Massachusetts School of Law also violates another rule by using practicing lawyers as part-time professors to teach law from a "clinical" rather than a theoretical basis. Its faculty does a lot of administrative work, something else the ABA cited in rejecting the school in 1993.
Breaking such archaic rules is the only way to make law school affordable to low-income students, Velvel says. "We'd like to be judged by the quality and ability of the lawyers we educate." he says.
MSL's results, he says, speak for themselves. So far, 89 percent of all MSL graduates have passed the Massachusetts bar exam. Its graduates are rarely hired at big Boston law firms. Most practice law in their home communities.