Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

The New Nuclear World Order

Yesterday's nuclear test by Pakistan, in response to India's, transforms the region.

By Jonathan S. LandayStaff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / May 29, 1998


Peace in South Asia, home to the poorest one-sixth of humanity, and the future of global disarmament have been plunged into uncertainty by Pakistan's detonation of five nuclear devices in response to five by rival India.

Skip to next paragraph

In setting off the devices yesterday in an underground shaft at a site in the remote Chagai region, Pakistan ignored threats of economic sanctions and pleas for restraint by President Clinton.

In authorizing the blasts, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif bowed to intense domestic pressure stoked by national pride and demands he ensure Pakistan's security. But he warned the 140 million Pakistanis that sanctions could create food shortages, restricting many to one meal a day.

These tests by India and Pakistan have transformed the global balance of power within 17 days. The two have joined five other countries - the United States, Russia, China, Britain, and France - in acknowledging they have nuclear weapons.

By doing so, they have brought the threat of nuclear annihilation to hundreds of millions of people. And as they develop missiles capable of lofting atomic warheads, they pose threats to other parts of Asia and portions of the Mideast.

But just how the new nuclear order will evolve remains unclear.

The new Indian-Pakistan nuclear capability adds to the uncertainty that has marked international developments since the end of the US-Soviet rivalry.

Many experts fear the tests will fuel an upsurge in the rivalry between Pakistan, an overwhelmingly Muslim state, and predominantly Hindu India. The two nations have fought three wars since they won independence from Britain in 1947. They came close to a fourth conflict in 1990 over Kashmir, a divided Himalayan region where the foes engage in near-daily clashes that US officials say have intensified since India's tests.

A war of words has also escalated in recent days, reaching new heights yesterday when Pakistan accused India of preparing to attack its nuclear facilities. New Delhi denied the charge.

The Pakistani test "takes us yet another step ... up the ladder of increased tensions in the South Asia region," says a US official, speaking on condition of anonymity. "It makes the security situation in the region even less controllable."

Such concerns are being stoked by aggressive missile development programs on both sides. In addition, neither country has a strategy for employing nuclear weapons, command-and-control systems, or civil defense measures.

Both face other tough calculations. Aside from the certainty of retaliation for a nuclear attack, both must grapple with the reality that by using atomic arms within the narrow confines of the Indian subcontinent, they risk killing many of their own people from radioactive fallout blown back across their border by the winds.

"The real dangerous time will come as both countries put the command structures and strategic systems in place for an effective nuclear deterrence," warns Sandy Gordon, author of "India's Rise to Power in the 20th Century and Beyond."

In Washington, Clinton said he was invoking a US law requiring him to impose on Pakistan the same sanctions that he slapped on India after it tested. He deplored Pakistan's decision, saying it had wasted "a truly priceless opportunity to strengthen its own security and to improve its political standing in the eyes of the world."