The relevance of first ladies

Regarding the front-page article ''Hillary Clinton Takes a Page From Eleanor Roosevelt Book,'' July 11: I was amazed to read that American University historian Allan Lichtman thinks ''that first ladies are irrelevant to their husbands' reelection chances, even when they have played important policy roles.'' Many components go into a marriage and many more into a presidential election. No matter what a person does (good or bad), is she irrelevant to her spouse's success or failure? I think the statement is baloney.

Nancy Leussler Glendale, Wis.

Your letters are welcome. For publication they must be signed and include your address and telephone number. Only a selection can be published and none acknowledged. Letters should be addressed to ''Readers Write'' and may be sent by mail to One Norway St., Boston, MA 02115, by fax to 617-450-2317, or by Internet E-mail (200 words maximum) to OPED@RACHEL.CSPS.COM.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK