Mexican Challenger Tries to Light Voters' Fires
After soaring to the top of presidential polls in May, Fernandez dropped from public view. He now hopes a media blitz can restore his prospects for ending the ruling party's 65-year rule.
DARK eyes flashing, stabbing the air with his finger, Diego Fernandez de Cevallos is doing what he does best: attack and counterattack.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
``As I predicted, as our strength grows ... there comes a cavalcade of insults, slander, defamation, and lies,'' growls the National Action Party (PAN) candidate for president of Mexico, working an audience of some 1,000 residents in a poor barrio on the fringes of Mexico City.
``From one day to the next, I've become a sinister man ... a lawyer of abortionists, and lover of narco-traffickers. My answer is very simple,'' says the bearded criminal lawyer, pausing for effect. ``Present your proof.''
Brusque. Cigar-chomping. Witty. Pugnacious. Crude.
The Queretaro State rancher known by his political handle ``The Chief'' is back, trying to re-kindle political momentum in the final weeks before the Aug. 21 election.
Suddenly the rage
The center-right party candidate became an overnight sensation in May, when he clobbered the front-running candidates in Mexico's first-ever televised presidential debate. Mr. Fernandez shot from a distant third to first place in some polls. Mexicans began to seriously consider that the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) might, for the first time in 65 years, lose a presidential election.
But then Fernandez took an unexpected political sabbatical. For 18 days in June and more than two weeks in July, he held no public campaign meetings. PAN officials called it a tactical move to prevent overexposure. Most of Mexico was ensconced in the World Cup soccer tournament playoffs anyway. And Fernandez was preparing for another debate, an economic policy showdown, with the ruling party candidate Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Leon.
But the debate never happened. Fernandez slipped back to as much as 15 points behind Mr. Zedillo in some polls. Other surveys show him still in a dead heat with the PRI candidate. Political analyst Arturo Sanchez believes PAN made a tactical error.
``Diego's campaign lost momentum. And the PRI won't give him a second chance to get on television and debate Zedillo again,'' says Mr. Sanchez of the Mexican Institute for Political Studies, a private Mexico City consulting firm. ``The question now becomes not what can Diego do to win, but what shouldn't the PRI do to lose in the next few weeks.''
PAN officials are mounting a media blitz, rather than the traditional tour of big campaign events around the country, to try to give Fernandez the widest possible exposure leading up to the election. And Fernandez will, along with the rest of the candidates, have the benefit of free television air time. The two leading television networks were pressured into giving away 15-minute blocks after their campaign news coverage was judged strongly biased in favor of the ruling party by government and civic studies.
Political analysts who give Fernandez a chance of winning, say he may benefit from the protest vote against the ruling party. Although President Carlos Salinas de Gortari remains popular, the Chiapas uprising of Mayan Indians in January and the assassination of the original PRI candidate, Luis Donaldo Colosio, has shaken public confidence in the PRI government.