Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDIATION PROGRAMS QUESTIONED

By Laurel Shaper Walters / July 18, 1994



ST. LOUIS

* Despite the proliferation of violence-prevention programs in schools, some researchers are expressing skepticism about their effectiveness.

Skip to next paragraph

While the majority of programs have not been carefully evaluated, early evidence suggests that violence-prevention programs are less effective than expected, says Patrick Tolan of the University of Illinois in Chicago.

Illinois now requires school districts to provide violence-prevention or conflict-resolution education in grades 4 through 12. But ``just because you have a program doesn't mean that you are actually doing something about violence,'' Mr. Tolan says.

``There is little convincing evidence that these programs bring about sustainable behavior change,'' says Daniel Webster, a researcher at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. In some cases, conflict-resolution programs may actually be doing more harm than good, Mr. Webster says. ``The danger is that politicians, parents, and the public may be fooled into thinking there's an easy solution to this problem: All we have to do is put a curriculum in our schools to teach our kids not to be violent.'' School-based programs could end up being used to provide ``political cover'' and distract the public from the real causes of youth violence, Webster argues.

``I don't think a child will be harmed by participating in these programs,'' Webster says, ``and it's certainly likely that many will benefit by gaining social skills but probably not in terms of measurable decreased risk of being a victim or a perpetrator of serious violence.'' The most egregious forms of youth violence, such as gun-related deaths, are ``unlikely to respond to these kinds of interventions,'' Webster says.

Analysis of school-based programs is a politically volatile issue. ``A lot of people are very invested in these programs, and they want to believe that they work,'' Webster says. ``I personally am not convinced.''

Both skeptics and proponents agree, however, that more research is needed. ``I'm not saying this is the last word,'' Webster says. ``There's a whole lot more science coming down the road on this.''