San Francisco's Homeless Plan Is Under Fire
Program's backers cite 4,000 arrests for `quality-of-life nuisance offenses' and a drop in the crime rate, but critics say chronic homeless and minorities are being harassed
WITH the season of giving fast approaching, a heated battle between this city's haves and have-nots is being fought from streets to stores to City Hall.Skip to next paragraph
Subscribe Today to the Monitor
Mayor Frank Jordan, swept into office last year with promises of cleaning up the city, is trying to answer public calls for clearing streets and sidewalks of aggressive panhandlers and vagrants. But his means of achieving that - a four-month-old ``Matrix'' homeless program - is being criticized for going too far and harassing the chronic homeless as well as a disproportionate number of minorities.
``I, as mayor of San Francisco, apologize to no one for the hard work we have put into the Matrix program,'' Mr. Jordan said at a press conference Monday. He invited citizens to a Board of Supervisors meeting called to pass a resolution against the program.
Citing 4,000 arrests for ``quality-of-life nuisance offenses'' -
including public intoxication, public urination, panhandling, trespassing, and encamping in public parks - Jordan claims a 30 percent drop in the crime rate since his program began in August.
But his main opponent on the Board of Supervisors, President Angela Alioto, says enforcing the citations has cost $1 million over three months, money that could be better spent attacking the problem of homelessness itself, rather than homeless people.
``My point is, let's fight serious crimes ... not quality-of-life crimes when we're in the middle of winter, and we are not offering any alternatives,'' Ms. Alioto says.
Recent polls say the public is split, with about 48 percent supporting the program and about 44 percent opposing it.
Scott Hill, who is living at a city homeless shelter, says the program is universally disliked by San Francisco's estimated 11,000 to 16,000 homeless.
``People who are doing no harm to anyone are being repeatedly harassed,'' says the unemployed 23-year-old, who has been homeless since he was 16. Mr. Hill recently was given a $65 ticket for sleeping in a park but says he cannot and will not pay. ``How you going to pay something like this when you don't even have money to eat?'' Homelessness incentive
Michael Johnson, who has been sleeping under a freeway ramp since he lost his job in February, says being out of work with no place to stay is incentive enough for homeless people to seek to change their situations.
``People think you are going to hurt them when they see someone who hasn't washed in a week come out of the shadows,'' he says. ``But that doesn't mean we're no good or that we're not trying.''
Officer David Ambrose, chief spokesman for the Police Department, says the program has had high public acceptance, based on phone calls made to precinct offices.
Beginning in August, police reported an increase in the number of complaints from residents, tourists, and merchants in two areas of the city. People living and working in the Civic Center area, near City Hall and many cultural buildings, as well as Union Square, a popular shopping district, said they were frightened and intimidated by the sheer numbers of street people.
Several tourists said they would not return to these areas because they had been subjected to serious crime and nuisance offenses.
``It's creepy,'' said a woman identifying herself only as a tourist from Iowa. ``You walk three blocks and have to say, `No,' to a dozen people asking for money. Then you turn the corner, and someone steps out of a doorway and gets in your face until you shout, `No!' ''