Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search


Britain's Conservative secretary of education has radical plans

By Jim BencivengaStaff writer of The Christian Science Monitor / November 30, 1987



London

BOTH Britain and the United States are charting new directions for their education systems. Buffeted by widespread dissatisfaction with poorly performing schools and low student academic achievement, policymakers in each country seek to link sweeping education reforms to greater national economic productivity. But unlike the US, where 50 states are the major and sole constitutional lawmaking bodies in education, the national government is the nexus of education policy in Britain. Nearly 56 percent of all funds spent on schools comes from the central government (compared to 6.5 percent from Washington). By 1990 it will be 75 percent. And with only 104 local education authorities (LEAs, analogous to 15,300 local school districts in the US), school governance is much more a top-down affair in Britain.

Skip to next paragraph

The difference is significant in a way that is unthinkable in the US. One can point to a single individual in the driver's seat for school policies. That individual is Kenneth Baker, secretary of state for education and science.

In a wide-ranging interview in his office Secretary Baker discussed with the Monitor his current plans for reforming British schools as well as his views on related education topics in the US.

``The whole thrust of both our [nations'] policies is to improve the quality of education,'' Mr. Baker says. But ``we are doing this in a rather different way from you.''

``We've brought education as an issue right back to the center of the stage. It's always been somewhere on the stage in the past, or lurking in the wings, but now it is center stage,'' Baker says. His Conservative Party has a majority of 100-plus seats in the current session of Parliament, giving the Tories sufficient votes to pass most if not all of their school reform agenda.

``We are having a national curriculum, and national testing,'' he says. The intent is ``to introduce some rigor, some benchmarks, so that the teachers know what to teach to [so that] the children know what to learn.''

Currently, the British have a single national test at age 16. Under the government's new plan, nationwide testing will occur at ages 7, 11, 14, and 16. For the most part, a national curriculum and testing program meets with widespread approval in Britain, as it is the only European country without a centralized course of study. Required subjects will be math, science, language, and history.

``We are galvanizing the power of parents,'' says Baker. He plans to give greater power to headmasters, moving budgets right down to the school level rather than LEAs.

The devolution of management and budgeting to the schools stems from the Tory philosophy that if schools are to improve their standards, they must be responsive to parental demands, as well as compete for students. This can happen only if the schools possess greater autonomy, he says.

In what is seen as the most radical proposal of his tenure, Baker will offer schools the choice of seceding from their own LEA. ``We are going to allow schools to `opt out' if a majority of the parents vote to do so,'' he says.