Entrapment

The acquittal of automaker John De Lorean sends a message to US law enforcement agencies: Americans are increasingly uneasy about the ethics of entrapment.

To the courts, entrapment - the luring of people into the commission of a crime - has a very precise definition and is illegal. Several congressional defendants in the Abscam case vainly argued in their defense that they had been entrapped by the FBI, one contention of the De Lorean defense as well.

But to the public, entrapment has a more general meaning: law enforcement efforts to lead prominent people into illegal situations, then charge them with crimes. The public doesn't like it, and shouldn't.

It is one thing when police set up a bogus fencing operation to attract house burglars into selling their stolen goods. Catching people like burglars who have already engaged in criminal activity is certainly permissible.

But it is quite another situation when a law enforcement agency entices a vulnerable, well-known person into a situation in which he ultimately incriminates himself - and then hauls him into court charged with a crime.

The case was notable for more than the entrapment issue. It was a long media circus, occupying much public attention for a year. In retrospect it was a public spectacle that served no positive purpose.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK