Free speech on the campus and in print

The government may not discriminate against the press even if its motive has nothing to do with curbing press freedom. This is the broad safeguard of First Amendment rights endorsed by the Supreme Court in overturning Minnesota's tax on paper and ink used by newspapers.

Justice O'Connor, writing her first opinion on a First Amendment issue, proved a strong champion. A special tax on newspapers, she said, threatens to undercut ''the basic assumption of our political system that the press will often serve as an important restraint on government.''

The decision does not rule out subjecting newspapers to general economic regulations. Does this invite applying general sales taxes to newspapers? It need not. So far only six states do so. Most should be expected to hold out against this form of taxing the flow of information, even as the Supreme Court has rejected the tax that a lower court had upheld in Minnesota.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK