Court lets people bilked in commodities file suit

The Supreme Court, resolving a major scandal in commodity futures trading, ruled 5 to 4 that people victimized by manipulations of a commodities market can sue their broker and the exchange for fraud. The justices rejected arguments from commodities exchanges and brokers claiming such suits could make them liable for millions of dollars in damages.

The cases before the justices focused on whether commodity trading laws can be enforced through private lawsuits. The ruling concluded that the history of federal law involving commodities ''quite clearly indicates that Congress intended to protect all futures traders from price manipulation and other fradulent conduct.''

In other action, the court agreed to hear a challenge by John Anderson, the 1980 presidential candidate, to Ohio election laws that make it difficult for independents to get on the ballot. Stepping into a political controversy that could open the door to more third-party bids for the White House in 1984, the justices next fall will review a decision that upheld Ohio's requirements, similar to those in other states, that compel a presidential candidate to qualify for the ballot as much as 71/2 months before the general election - long before the deadline for Democrats and Republicans.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK