Court to rule on guilt of murder accomplices

The Supreme Court agreed to decide whether someone who was not the ''trigger man'' in a murder can be sentenced to death. The high court ruled in 1976 that execution, when applied under rigorous legal guidelines, is not necessarily ''cruel and unusual punishment'' forbidden by the Constitution. But the justices have never ruled directly on whether an accomplice in a felony that included a murder can be sentenced to death.

In a case now before the court, the condemned man maintains he did not actually kill the victim, was not present at the scene, and did not intend the death of the victim.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK