Court reverses ruling on testimony of spouses

The Supreme Court upset a precedent Wednesday dating back to medieval times by ruling that a husband or wife may testify against a spouse over the partner's objections. The court upheld the conviction of Otis Lee Trammel on charges of smuggling heroin into the country. Mr. Trammel was convicted almost solely on the basis of his wife's testimony.

He challenged the conviction, citing a 1958 case in which the court ruled that one spouse can prevent the other from testifying against him or her.

But the court Wednesday reversed that ruling, saying that "reason and experience" no longer justified such a rule. The court's new ruling means that a husband or wife may now testify against a spouse about any act observed during the marriage or any conversation made in the presence of a third party. But one spouse may still prevent the other from testifying about any confidential communication between the two alone.

About these ads
Sponsored Content by LockerDome

We want to hear, did we miss an angle we should have covered? Should we come back to this topic? Or just give us a rating for this story. We want to hear from you.

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Save for later

Save
Cancel

Saved ( of items)

This item has been saved to read later from any device.
Access saved items through your user name at the top of the page.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You reached the limit of 20 saved items.
Please visit following link to manage you saved items.

View Saved Items

OK

Failed to save

You have already saved this item.

View Saved Items

OK