Katie Ledecky: A gold present and hint of the Olympic future

US swimmers Katie Ledecky and Michael Phelps gave US swim fans a gold-medal performance on Tuesday, suggesting that the US swim team's competitive past has a strong future.

David J. Phillip/AP
United States Olympian Katie Ledecky wins the gold medal in the women's 200-meter freestyle during the swimming competitions at the 2016 Summer Olympics on Tuesday, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

US swimmer Katie Ledecky won her second gold medal in Rio de Janeiro with a wrenching victory in the 200-meter freestyle on Tuesday night.

She beat the generally faster swimmer, Sarah Sjöström of Sweden, to become the fourth American woman to win three individual gold medals, counting her gold from the 2012 London Olympics, The Washington Post noted – and this wasn't even her best event.

With 25-time (and counting) medalist Michael Phelps swimming his final Olympic laps in Rio, Ms. Ledecky's performance is an exciting reminder to Americans that the show will go on for the US swim team – and it promises to be a good show.

"That was such a tough race. Everything was hurting, and I knew I wouldn't be able to see most of field on last 50, so I knew I had to just dig deep," Ledecky told the Post. "When I saw it [first place] on scoreboard, it sunk in then. I was done when I touched the wall. I gave it everything I had there, and I knew I had to."

Ledecky has another chance to swim for the gold in Wednesday night's 4x200-meter free relay and the 800-meter freestyle on Friday, her signature event.

Tuesday also gave Mr. Phelps a victory in the 200-meter freestyle, his second gold at Rio and his 20th overall, and he earned another gold for his performance on the 4x200-meter freestyle relay. It was a dramatic intersection of victory for both Ledecky, the bubbly 19-year-old often viewed as the future of the US swim team, and that of Phelps, whose previous four Olympics have become an integral part of the event's history. But Ledecky insists there is no need to wait.

"I'm kind of the present, too," the four-time Olympic medalist told NPR.

Another telling sign of the future came from the US swim trials before Rio, where favorites Natalie Coughlin, Matt Grevers, and Tyler Clary were left behind after losing to stiff competition from talented new swimmers. Even Missy Franklin wondered for a few tense moments whether she would have have an opportunity to replicate the performance.

"Right now I need to make the team in whatever way that looks like," she told the Associated Press after finishing a disappointing seventh in the 100-meter backstroke, an event that produced one of her four gold medals in London.

Although she did not qualify for the finals in the 200-meter freestyle, Ms. Franklin will swim the 200-meter backstroke on Thursday, and she will also swim in a freestyle relay.

Phelps and fellow US swimmer Ryan Lochte agreed with her assessment of the US team's competitive edge.

"You can never go in knowing that you're going to make the team, just because the US is one of the hardest countries to make the Olympic team because they're so strong in every event," Mr. Lochte told the AP.

The gold medal performances on Tuesday give American swim fans no reason to doubt that that strength will continue.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.