Keni Harrison hurdles from Olympic trials defeat to world record

American hurdler Keni Harrison broke a world record on Friday, less than a month after failing to make the US Olympic team.

Matt Dunham/AP
Kendra Harrison of the US clears the final hurdle as she runs on to win the women's 100 meter hurdles in a world record time of 12.20 seconds during the Diamond League anniversary games at The Stadium, in the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park in London, on Friday.

American Keni Harrison broke the world record in the 100-meter hurdle during a race at the London Olympic stadium on Friday, a dramatic victory after disappointment at the US Olympic trials.

That the world record was broken mere weeks after the Olympic trials by a hurdler who did not make the US team raises sticky questions among American athletes, especially when the trials are tougher than the international competition.

"Not making the Olympic team I was really upset,” Ms. Harrison told USA Today. “And I wanted to come out here and do what I know what I could have done [in Rio]."

Harrison broke Yordanka Donkova’s 1988 record with a 12.20 finish during the Diamond League competition. She finished ahead of several runners who had beaten her during the Olympic trials, where she finished in sixth place, the BBC reported.

“You have one bad day but I knew I still had it in me,” Harrison told US Today. “I was coming out here with just vengeance to show these girls what I have.”

Dramatic illustrations of the intensity of US competition exist off the track as well. In the swimming pool, several US Olympic veterans who left London with multiple medals lost their chance at the Rio 2016 Olympics to excellent new swimmers. 

The US swim team qualifiers left several favorites behind, including Natalie Coughlin, Matt Grevers, and Tyler Clary. There were serious questions about whether America's top female swimmer Missy Franklin, who took four gold medals and bronze in a relay at the 2012 London Olympics, would compete in more than a relay, the Associated Press reported.

"Right now I need to make the team in whatever way that looks like," she told the AP after finishing a disappointing seventh in the 100-meter backstroke, where she took a gold medal in 2012.

Ms. Franklin ultimately secured her spot by way of the 200-meter backstroke, freestyle, and a relay team.

Her initial struggles, and the list of stellar swimmers who will not attend the Rio 2016 Olympics at all, prompted questions about whether some sports' US trials exceed the Olympics for intensity. 

"You can never go in knowing that you're going to make the team, just because the US is one of the hardest countries to make the Olympic team because they're so strong in every event," Ryan Lochte, a fourth-place qualifier in the 200-meter freestyle, told the Associated Press. "You've just got to hope and believe that you can."

His long-time rival and fellow US swimmer Michael Phelps agreed. 

"It's harder here," he said.

On the one hand, such competitive trials are a mark of the US team's strength across the board and a source of national pride. But on the other, they suggest that top-notch athletes – or in Harrison's case, world record-breaking athletes – may never leave American soil, simply because they missed their chance by milliseconds in in the US Olympic trials. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.