Why global access to education hasn't translated to equal pay for women

Women are often excluded from higher paying jobs and not compensated for household work, which takes away hours they would otherwise get paid for.

Stuart Ramson/UN Foundation/AP/File
Speakers at the opening ceremony of the 6th Annual Social Good Summit celebrate the adoption of the new Sustainable Development Goals on Sunday, Sept. 27, 2015 in New York City.

Women worldwide are closer to closing the global education gap with men, a years-long trend. Yet that progress hasn't translated to women accessing equal employment opportunities, according to a new study.

For decades, international organizations such as the United Nations and the World Bank have been strong advocates of education, framing it as key to decreasing global inequality and eradicating poverty, as high levels of education are expected to raise income levels.

But a new study, published Friday in the Journal of African Developmentnoted that while women have attained 91 percent of the amount of education men have, measured by years in school, they lag behind in employment and political representation: 70 percent and 26 percent, respectively. 

"Clearly, education alone is not enough to solve this problem," said Stephanie Seguino, study author and University of Vermont economist, in a statement. "We need concrete policy tools to break down gender barriers, because the market's 'invisible hand' is not working."

To conduct the study, Dr. Seguino employed three key categories including capability, which measured education and health data; livelihoods, which measured employment and job segregation; and agency, which looked at the level of political representation. The study examined three decades of data from the World Bank and the International Labor Organization.

The two main contributors to women's lower employment rate and pay, the study found, are that women are often excluded from higher paying jobs, and they are not compensated for household work, which takes away time they could otherwise spend in paid jobs.

"There continue to be gender stereotypes about who has a right to a job, and the evidence suggests that there continues to be a male breadwinner bias, so that when jobs are scarce, men are preferred for jobs,” Seguino tells The Christian Science Monitor in an interview.  

"Many women have a 'care burden' for children, for the elderly, and so forth," she says, and high childcare costs may cancel out any wages those women earn, making a job itself unaffordable. 

While education remains a priority, policy makers need to start expanding their focus to include other issues that prevent women from accessing equal job opportunities, Seguino says. In paid parental leave laws, for example, governments can include men's right to take time off, decreasing women's care burden. In addition, investments in infrastructure can reduce the time women spend on unpaid work, such as decreasing time spent fetching water or firewood. 

But those changes have to be matched with changes in political representation, as that remains the arena where women are marginalized the most, the study found. Although great strides have been made towards gender equality in education and life expectancy, political representation made only slight progress in three decades.

Women occupied 26 percent of parliamentary seats worldwide in 2011, versus 12 percent in 1990, the study found.

That representation gulf is especially worrying, Seguino says, because "so many of the tools that we have to promote gender equality come from the government."

She continues, "Without women's representation in political bodies you don't have that perspective represented, so those resources don’t necessarily get allocated in ways that can promote gender equality. That really requires women's voices in public bodies."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.