Why Moms target Kroger stores for next firearms ban

Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America are calling for a weekend boycott of Kroger until it bans shoppers from openly carrying firearms. So far, the nation's largest grocery store chain is resisting a policy change.

(AP Photo/Michael Conroy, File)
Two women got into a gun fight at a Kroger store in Lawrenceville, Ga., a suburb of Atlanta, in February. No one besides the two women were injured. Here, a Kroger sign on a store in Indianapolis.

Ten days into a campaign to get the nation's largest supermarket chain to ban the open carry of guns, Kroger is walking a tightrope.

The gun-control group Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America is calling on shoppers to boycott the Cincinnati-based grocery chain on weekends unless the store supports their position of asking shoppers not to openly carry firearms.

Moms Demand Action have been successful in pushing half-a-dozen other major retailers into compliance, including Target in July.

"Moms need to shop for groceries, but we don't have to shop at stores that put our families in harm's way," said Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action.

So far, Krogers is staking out the middle ground.

"Our long-standing policy on this issue is to follow state and local laws and to ask customers to be respectful of others while shopping," Kroger said in a statement. "We know that our customers are passionate on both sides of this issue, and we trust them to be responsible in our stores."

In addition to the boycott, the Moms have an online "Groceries, not guns" petition to encourage emails to Kroger CEOs.

These campaigns targetting retail stores have been a response to the effectiveness of the National Rifle Association in preventing further government regulations on firearms. And are part of a larger ongoing battle between advocates of Second Amendment rights and those seeking greater gun controls to combat violence.

As The Christian Science Monitor reported:

"The [anti-gun violence] petitions have come in response to demonstrations by so-called open-carry groups where members bring loaded assault-style firearms into stores. Those tactics have sparked a rare public backlash against public gun carry and introspection among gun owners in a country where states recently have, on the whole, pushed laws strengthening gun and self-defense rights.

To be sure, gun rights groups point out that some recent corporate policy changes are meaningless since they don’t actually ban guns, but simply request nicely that customers don’t bring them. But after the pressure on corporations like Starbucks and now Target to change their policy on guns, it’s clear that what Moms Demand Action calls its “common-sense” approach on the Second Amendment is winning converts, and at least shifting the weight slightly on the long-running tug of war between pro-gun lobbyists like the National Rifle Association and gun control and antiviolence organizations.

Last fall, Starbucks issued this statement: "We are respectfully requesting that customers no longer bring firearms into our stores or outdoor seating areas – even in states where 'open carry' is permitted – unless they are authorized law enforcement personnel," Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz wrote on Sept. 17. "This is a request and not an outright ban ... because we want to give responsible gun owners the chance to respect our request."

Who's likely to blink first in this Kroger vs. Moms Demand Action showdown? It all depends on the effectiveness of the Moms anti-gun boycott, according to an analyst interviewed by Cincinnati.com.

Matt McCormick, a portfolio manager with Bahl & Gaynor, said Kroger is being targeted because of its size. If a boycott materializes, the retailer ultimately will do a cost-benefit analysis on lost sales before making another move.

"It would be quite a plum if they got Kroger to ban guns," he said. "Deep down for Kroger, it's not a political decision, an ethical or moral decision, it's a business decision."

[Editor's Note: The original story didn't make clear that Moms Demand Action is only asking Kroger customers to shop elsewhere on weekends, and is not seeking a complete ban on firearms, but a policy that doesn't allow open carry of firearms in the stores.]

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.