NRA to students: Want to move up to the next grade? Learn how to shoot a gun

A National Rifle Association video entitled 'Everyone get a gun' proposes seldom heard policy changes of introducing guns to children.

A new National Rifle Association video supports firearm instruction in elementary school and proposes mandatory gun ownership, both garnering political and media blowback.

Entitled "Everyone get a gun," an NRA News video posted to YouTube on July 21 showcases hipsterish commentator Billy Johnson advocating for previously unheard gun policies based on the Founding Fathers’ ideals. 

“What if instead of gun-free zones, we had gun-required zones,” asks Mr. Johnson, recommending that “we design gun policy from the assumption that people need guns – that guns make people’s lives better.”

With his plastic frames, kempt beard and black t-shirt bedecked, Johnson is part of an NRA millennial-outreach program to connect with demographics less interested in guns, according to Mark Prentice, a staffer at the gun control lobbing group Americans for Responsible Solutions.

The gun ownership rate has declined significantly over four decades, with a third of all American households possessing guns, down from half of all households in the 1970s, reported The New York Times in 2013.

In the video, Johnson suggests adding sharpshooting to public school curricula nationwide.

“Just like we teach them reading and writing, necessary skills, we would teach shooting, he says. “It wouldn't matter if a child's parents weren't good at it. We'd find them a mentor. It wouldn't matter if they didn't want to learn. We would make it necessary to advance to the next grade."

The proposal is no laughing matter, says Erika Soto Lamb, communications director with the pro-gun control group, Everytown for Gun Safety.

“We believe that our children should be going to school to learn math and science, not to hold an assault rifle, says Ms. Soto Lamb, stating that she believed most mothers did not want shooting skills to be taught in public schools.

“The idea that a child would have to show proficiency in guns to advance to the next grade is provocative,” she adds, questioning whether the NRA was even serious in its proposal.

The video also recommends that the government “subsidize gun purchases with public ranges “where you could shoot for free or a yearly allotment of free ammunition.”

In response to media inquiries, the NRA declined to comment.

Previous videos on the online NRA television network also featured seldom-heard proposals and viewpoints. According to Media Matters, a left-wing news site:

▪ A July 18 commentary referenced the Holocaust to promote the baseless fear that the government will confiscate lawfully held private firearms.

▪ A July 7 commentary claimed that laws regulating gun ownership are "equally as unconstitutional" as Jim Crow laws.

▪ A June 30 commentary insisted that the media stop calling a man who used a gun to injure or kill 11 of his 19 victims during a May 23 rampage in Isla Vista, California, a "gunman" or "shooter" because several other people were killed and injured by means other than a gun during the attack.

Since the Sandy Hook elementary school incident – when 20 kindergarteners were killed by a gunman – there have been 74 school shootings nationwide, reported The Washington Post.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.