Stuart Scott: Will there ever be another sports anchor like him?

The passing of ESPN's Stuart Scott prompts an outpouring of memorials and honors from the sporting world, especially the athletes who he covered. 

John Shearer/File/AP
In a July 16, 2014 file photo, sportscaster Stuart Scott accepts the Jimmy V award for perseverance, at the ESPY Awards in Los Angeles. Scott, the longtime “SportsCenter” anchor and ESPN personality known for his known for his enthusiasm and ubiquity, died Sunday, Jan. 4, 2015 after a long fight with cancer. He was 49.

From a moment of silence before his alma mater University of North Carolina Tar Heels tipped off against Notre Dame, to a simple message written on NBA superstar Kevin Durant's sneakers, the athletes, fans, and colleagues have paid homage to Stuart Scott, an ESPN sportscaster who passed away on Sunday.  

On Twitter, Los Angeles Lakers star Kobe Bryant simply said his words "changed the game."

Game recaps from the local teams were always available on the morning network affiliate newscasts, but Scott made them into highlights as fans have come to know them on SportsCenter. Scott passed away this weekend after battling cancer for a third time and an element of sports on television passed with him. He had an unmistakeable voice and a seemingly endless cache of catch-phrases that changed how we talk about sports, according to Michael Wilbon of ESPN.

I was brought up in a buttoned-up world of traditional journalism where the person reporting/commenting/analyzing didn't call attention to himself. Stuart, very deliberately and without much fear, was in the process of taking us to a new world of sports coverage, one where you let your emotion come pouring out much of the time, where personality would infuse the coverage. It wasn't just that a Scott-delivered story sounded "blacker" -- and it did, it sounded younger, and hipper, had greater edge and connected with an entire population of viewers who had been ignored. Not every reference to music needed to be the Beatles or Rolling Stones, not for those of us who preferred Earth, Wind & Fire or Chuck D. More than anybody working then or now, Stuart Scott changed the very language used to discuss sports every day. He updated it, freshened it, made it more inclusive.

Part of what separated Scott from his contemporaries was that he became every bit as popular as the athletes he was covering. In turn, the memorials to him from across the pro sports world are in many ways unprecedented for a member of the national sports media. The Tar Heels wore a "Stu" patch on their jerseys for the game against Notre Dame.

His image appeared on Jumbotrons across the country. The Boston Celtics' broadcasters used his famous catch-phrases, such as "Booya," on their call of Monday night's game against Charlotte.

NBA legend Michael Jordan, who does not speak up often, felt obligated to release a statement about his fallen Tar Heel friend and sent his condolences to Scott's family. From President Obama, Lebron James to Magic Johnson the reaction to Scott's passing was heartfelt.

Atlanta Falcons wide receiver, Harry Douglas summed up what a lot of younger sports fans and younger pros who grew up watching Mr. Scott every morning before school felt in his tweet. 

New England Patriots tight end Rob Gronkowski also tweeted his condolences and added that he and his family still talk about the first time they met Scott. His ESPN colleagues would chalk that up to a testament of the kind of energetic and engaging person Scott was.  

Scott was not just another sports anchor – he made himself into a part of the game experience he was presenting to the audience.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.