Stan Kroenke plans NFL stadium in Los Angeles. Will he really move the Rams?

St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke has plans to build an 80,000-seat stadium near Los Angeles, fueling speculation that the NFL may be returning to the area after two decades. But could the plans be merely a negotiating tactic to get the Rams a new stadium in St. Louis? 

Tom Gannam/AP/File
St. Louis Rams team owner Stan Kroenke speaks at the press conference in St. Louis. Kroenke has plans to build an NFL stadium in Los Angeles County, boosting the chances that pro football could return to the region.

For sports franchises, Los Angeles is among the nation’s most coveted markets – it’s huge, to start, and all that warm weather and proximity to Hollywood make it an attractive landing spot for superstar athletes. Still, the nation’s second-largest media market has gone two decades without a representative in America's most popular sport, the NFL. But that may change, and soon.

Stan Kroenke, the owner of the NFL’s St. Louis Rams, has plans to build an 80,000-seat stadium in Inglewood in Los Angeles County, the Los Angeles Times reported Monday. For the project, Mr. Kroenke has partnered with Stockbridge Capital Group, which owns the nearly 300-acre Hollywood Park lot that will be the site of the stadium. The space has already been approved for a large retail, office, and residential complex; with Kroenke’s involvement, the stadium and a 6,000-seat music performance venue would be added on. 

For many, news of the deal, and the stadium plans, were hardly a surprise. Kroenke, bought 60 acres adjacent to the Hollywood Park lot a year ago, and rumblings of the NFL’s move back to Los Angeles have been percolating practically since the Rams and the Raiders (now in Oakland) left town in 1994. According to the LA Times, Kroenke’s plans are just the latest in a series of proposals to bring an NFL stadium back to LA over the years, but Kroenke’s is the first to involve a piece of land big enough for both a stadium and parking.

He also has an NFL team, and one in a small media market (St. Louis) that is unhappy with its outdated stadium. The Rams have 10 years left on the lease in their current home, the Edward Jones Dome, but they can choose this month to convert it to a year-to-year lease, which would seem to clear the way for a move westward.

Still, no one is selling LA Rams t-shirts just yet. The NFL said in a statement Monday that no team had applied for a relocation for 2015, so 2016 would be the earliest a franchise could theoretically kick off in Los Angeles. Other small market teams in aging stadiums, including the San Diego Chargers and the Oakland Raiders (both of which played previously in Los Angeles) have also been touted as possibilities for relocation. What’s more, not having an LA franchise has been an effective negotiating tool for the NFL for the last two decades – teams in other cities looking to get public money for a new stadium or renovations can threaten to relocate.

But valuable as Los Angeles has been to the NFL without an NFL team, it would be undeniably valuable with one, too. FiveThirtyEight estimates that 3.7 million NFL fans are up for grabs in the area, and fan interest is comparable to cities that actually have teams. What’s more, an NFL base in the area could be useful (and profitable) to the league beyond the team itself. “Kind of an NFL hub is what they’d like it to be,” Nick Wagoner, an ESPN reporter covering the Rams, said on the network Monday afternoon. “NFL Network would be there, NFL.com would be there, and they could move all of their developments up from Culver City to Inglewood …Super Bowls could be hosted there…I think that’s what they would envision.”

Still, given the history of false starts for NFL franchises coming back to the city, many are skeptical that a move will actually get done, and that this isn’t part of Kroenke’s plan to get more money from St. Louis and the state of Missouri for a new stadium deal. Indeed, Missouri governor Jay Nixon and St. Louis business leaders are  reportedly readying plans to pitch Kroenke a new stadium for the Rams. “Show us the football. Show us that an existing NFL team will actually jump through all the flaming hoops to move here,” LA Times columnist Bill Plaschke wrote Monday.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.