Taylor Swift’s '1989' sounds familiar. Here's why.

Taylor Swift's newest album, '1989,' has a ring of familiarity, even on first listen. Taylor Swift's album has the Swedish touch.

Big Machine Records/AP
This CD cover image released by Big Machine Records shows '1989,' the latest release by Taylor Swift.

Taylor Swift’s full-on transition to pop with "1989” brings her into a network of stars who share the producers that have touched many of today’s radio hits.

 “1989,” released Monday morning from Big Machine Records, is now the best-selling iTunes album. Her first single from the CD, “Shake It Off,” opened with a No. 1 ranking in the U.S. Billboard Hot 100

But you’re not alone in thinking that these fresh tracks sound familiar, even on first listen.

The producers behind Ms. Swift’s “1989” release have handled other explosive singles, too: Ellie Goulding’s “Burn,” “We Are Young” from fun., and Gavin DeGraw’s “Not Over You.”

Max Martin co-produced nine tracks of the 13-song album. He began working with Swift in her 2012 album “Red,” co-producing the album’s first single – “We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together.” (He’s also responsible co-writing and co-producing “Shake It Off”)

The Swedish producer has had decades of experience with pop music. His influence reaches back to Britney Spears’s 1998 single “…Baby One More Time.”  And he’s no stranger to rebranding pop stars. Kelly Clarkson won over hearts on American Idol, but “Since U Been Gone,” a 2004 track, solidified her place in pop, allowing her to move beyond the reality TV show fame. 

Mr. Martin and Johan Schuster (aka Shellback), collaborated on seven of Martin’s nine tracks for Swift’s new album. Shellback, a Swedish songwriter, producer, and musician, has also written for Pink, Maroon 5, and One Direction.

Ryan Tedder, Noel Zancanella and Swift produced the album’s third single, “Welcome To New York.” Mr. Tedder is best known for being the lead singer of OneRepublic and wrote “Apologize” for the five-man band. The hit song ranked on nine different 2007 year-end charts.

Unlike the keep-jumping-until-the-last-beat songs, “Clean,” a slower track that draws on themes of renewal, closes Swift’s album. “And by morning, gone was any trace of you, I think I am finally clean,” she sings, repeating the last line as the track fades. The electronic dream-pop comes courtesy of Imogen Heap, who co-wrote and co-produced the track with Swift.

Ms. Heap came into the mainstream with “Hide and Seek,” which played in the second season finale of Fox’s teen drama “The O.C.”

“This Love” is the only track that Swift wrote alone, a shift from prior albums. She was the sole author on nine of 16 songs on “Red,” and for the 2010 “Speak Now” release, she wrote and composed all 14 songs.

Swift told E! News that she was driven to collaborate more heavily in “1989” after reflecting on “Red.” She said her favorite song on “Red” was “I Knew You Were Trouble,” a single that sold more than 416,000 copies in its first week. Martin and Shellback wrote the song with Swift.

“And I started kind of thinking about that and going, 'All right. I learned a lot when I was making Red. I collaborated with a lot of people. And I kind of learned who I wanted to go back to, and those collaborations were all with the pop producers and writers that I had been working with.”

Last week, “1989” nabbed largely positive reviews from critics, but fans have weighed in since the release online, sharing their thoughts on Twitter.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Taylor Swift’s '1989' sounds familiar. Here's why.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today