Taylor Swift: Is her album '1989' a successful move to pop?

Swift's new album won't be released until Oct. 27, but reviews are already coming in. Though many reviewers note that her previous work had more than a tinge of pop to it, the singer announced that '1989' is her official move to the genre from country.

Al Powers/Powers Imagery/Invision/AP
Taylor Swift performs at the iHeartRadio Music Festival at the MGM Grand Garden Arena in 2014.

Taylor Swift’s new album “1989” isn’t coming out until Oct. 27, but fans have already heard some of the songs off the album and some critics have already weighed in. 

Songs such as “Shake It Off,” “Out of the Woods,” and “Welcome to New York” have already made their debut – the music video for “Shake” premiered as Swift announced her new album during a Yahoo livestream on Aug. 18. During the livestream, Swift called “1989” her “first documented, official pop album.”

The singer spoke more about the upcoming album recently in an interview with Billboard

“This time I'm kind of just doing whatever I feel like,” Swift said. “I felt like making a pop album, so I did. I felt like being very honest and unapologetic about it, so I did… This album was made completely and solely on my terms, with no one else's opinion factoring in, no one else's agenda factoring in. I didn't feel that I was having to think too hard about the musical direction. In the past, I've always tried to make sure that I was maintaining a stronghold on two different genres, and this time I just had to think about one, which was creatively a relief. It was nice to be honest about what I was making.” 

The album is getting mainly positive reviews from the critics who have weighed in ahead of its release. Jon Caramanica of the New York Times wrote that “1989” is “full of expertly constructed, slightly neutered songs about heartbreak… breezily effective… ‘Welcome to New York’ [is] a shimmery, if slightly dim celebration of the freedom of getting lost in Gotham.” 

Rolling Stone writer Rob Sheffield wrote, “The best moments come toward the end [with] ‘How You Get the Girl’… ‘This Love’… [and] the killer finale, ‘Clean’… [it’s] deeply weird, feverishly emotional, wildly enthusiastic.”

USA Today critic Elysa Gardner awarded it three-and-a-half out of four stars.

“On 1989, she matches deceptively simple, irresistibly catchy melodies with lyrics that can seem by turns confessional and elusive, playful and aching,” she wrote.

However, Entertainment Weekly writer Adam Markovitz gave the new album a B, writing that “too often on 1989 [Swift is] trying to win at somebody else's game, whittling her words down to generic love stuff over flowy synthesizers” and found the song “Welcome to New York” to be “underripe,” though he called “Shake It Off” “kinetic” and wrote that “'’I Wish You Would’ and '’Out of the Woods’ [are] ballads with driving beats that complement her cinematic verses.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.