‘Woolgathering’ and other not-so-idle pursuits

Today, "woolgathering" sounds harmless. But its negative connotations – like absent-mindedness – reflect past scorn for impoverished women.


A person who is woolgathering is idly daydreaming. Someone at loose ends has nothing in particular to do. Folk etymology holds that these two idioms, which in different ways imply inattention to more important tasks, arose from the same situation – someone assigning busywork to others, to prevent them from being idle. They are similar, too, in that both their folk etymologies are mostly wrong. 

According to Brewer’s Dictionary of Phrase and Fable (circa 1870), the idea of woolgathering comes from rural mothers tasking their children with picking tufts of wool off hedges, as a way to keep them occupied. The dictionary explains, “While so employed, they are absent, and to a trivial purpose.” A commentator on the dictionary adds, “The phrase came to be used contemptuously of those engaged in any trifling pursuit, and so not attending to serious matters.” 

It’s not mothers coming up with ways to keep the kids out of trouble in the case of at loose ends – it’s superior officers on board large sailing ships. These ships carried lots of rope (one 18th-century British battleship had 31 miles of rigging), which tended to unravel. When sailors were sitting around doing nothing, they would be ordered to find and bind up, or “whip,” the ends of any rope that was coming apart. Idle men would thus find themselves “at loose ends.” 

Elements of these folk etymologies are true, but they are misleading. Woolgathering was first used to mean “daydreaming” in the 16th century, when the task was not silly make-work for children but an important contribution to the livelihoods of poor people. Those who were unable to perform more demanding jobs – older women and very young children – would collect tufts of wool that had snagged on bushes, either to sell or to spin to make their own clothing. Woolgathering was a traditional and important right of rural poor people, a kind of gleaning just like collecting grains and vegetables from fields after harvest.  

Today, woolgathering sounds harmless – one wanders contentedly among the hedgerows. Its negative connotations – absent-mindedness, fuzzy thinking – however, reflect scorn for the impoverished women who relied on it long ago.

The actual origin of at loose ends is more prosaic. Sailors did, and indeed still do, need to bind up rope when it starts to unravel, but this appears not to have been the source of the phrase. According to the Cambridge Dictionary of American Idioms, it is based on “the idea of a string or rope with ends that are not neatly tied together.” The loose ends of a rope are not doing anything useful, just hanging there; a person at loose ends is metaphorically doing the same thing.  

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to ‘Woolgathering’ and other not-so-idle pursuits
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today