How lawyers assumed the title of ‘esquire’

The U.S. Constitution prevents the government from issuing titles of nobility, but the not-quite-a-title esquire slipped through.


In formal correspondence and in court opinions, attorneys are given the title esq., short for esquire. This seems like an odd honorific, as historically esquires or squires were either young men who helped knights with their armor or low-ranking nobles. How did American attorneys come to adopt this title?  

The word squire derives from scūtum, Latin for “shield” – squires were “shield-bearers” for medieval knights who hoped to become knights themselves. These men were called squires for most of the Middle Ages, but esquire began to appear in the 15th century.

Confusion arose at this point because another group of people were also “shield-bearers” – the British aristocracy, who had been granted coats of arms that they could wear on an escutcheon (a fancy French heraldic word for “shield”). Men near the bottom rank of the British nobility, who had such arms but lacked a title such as “baronet” or “gentleman,” were called esquires.

While status was clear among the dukes and earls at the top of the hierarchy, things got fuzzy among the low-ranking nobles. Even the Oxford English Dictionary throws up its hands when faced with the difficulties of defining, exactly, who is “officially” an esquire: “it would be impossible here to state the divergent views on the subject.” In the 18th century it thus became de rigueur to hedge one’s bets and use the title for everyone who might conceivably be important, whether by birth, education, or professional achievement.  

The U.S. Constitution prevents the government from issuing titles of nobility, and its officeholders from accepting them, but the not-quite-a-title esquire slipped through. Its use declined in the second half of the 19th century in the United States and Britain, until the only people still interested in being esquires were lawyers. Perhaps it makes sense to want one’s own title in the U.S. legal system, where judges are referred to as “the honorable so and so.”  

While there are no official rules about who gets to be called esquire today, the term is conventionally limited to lawyers who have passed their state’s bar exam and are thus licensed to practice law. A lawyer who has graduated from law school but not yet passed the bar should be called “so and so, J.D.” (juris doctor, “doctor of law”) instead. 

According to lawyer and language maven Bryan Garner, it’s infra dig to refer to oneself as “esquire” or print “My name, Esq.” on one’s business cards – you just have to hope that other people will give you your due. And finally, he notes that it is correct to use the title for both male and female attorneys. Esquire is a strange remnant of an archaic class system, but at least it’s gender neutral! 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to How lawyers assumed the title of ‘esquire’
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today