Wild Sound: A Q & A with Laura Krantz

Illustration by Christopher M. Button

Laura Krantz's interest in Bigfoot began when she discovered that the late Grover Krantz, an eminent anthropologist known for prowling the Pacific Northwest in search of Bigfoot, had been a distant cousin of hers. Her curiosity eventually led her to create “Wild Thing,” a podcast about Bigfoot, the people who search for him, and the evidence they gather. (You can subscribe via iTunesStitcher, or your favorite podcasting app.)
Eoin O'Carroll, a science writer for the Monitor, chatted with Laura about her podcast, the people she met, and why we want to believe. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

So why Bigfoot? I understand there’s a long-lost cousin involved?

I had really never thought about Bigfoot ever, but then when I was living in D.C. and working for NPR, I was flipping through The Washington Post and there was a big article in the Style section that was talking about this guy named Grover Krantz, who had donated his bones and the bones of his dogs to the Smithsonian in D.C. He was from Salt Lake, and that’s where my family’s from.

Why We Wrote This

It can be easy to dismiss people who believe in mythical monsters as unhinged. But when journalist Laura Krantz interviewed Bigfoot hunters for her podcast “Wild Thing,” she began to see them in a new light.

Then there’s this throwaway paragraph in there that says Krantz was a legend in anthropology circles for driving around the Pacific Northwest with a spotlight and a rifle, searching for Sasquatch. It also mentioned that he was a tenured anthropology professor at Washington State University and a fairly well-respected one at that. I’m thinking, “Well if this guy is a tenured professor of anthropology, and if he believes in Bigfoot, I wonder if there’s more to it than I thought.”

What are some of the unique ways a podcast can shed light on Bigfoot?

I think some of the fun of this is actually talking to all these different people out there who have spent tremendous amounts of time and money and energy looking for Bigfoot. It’s really changed their life. You can hear some of the fear or the awe or the befuddlement that people have in their voices. There’s clearly something about Bigfoot that captures people’s imaginations. And I think hearing their voices and hearing them tell their stories and hearing their reactions is a much more effective tool than just putting it into a book. Not to say that there aren’t some great books out there, but it’s a different medium and a lot of fun to work with.

Is there anything that you noticed that Bigfoot believers tend to have in common?

I sort of lump the Bigfoot people into two different camps. There are the people who, like my cousin, were looking at this from the point of view that Bigfoot is a living, breathing biological species that we have not identified yet. And they are pursuing it from a biologist’s or a naturalist’s or zoologist’s point of view, where they’re going out and looking for physical evidence that this creature exists.

And then there’s the other side of that, where there’s people who think of Bigfoot as having more paranormal powers, like the ability to cloak and the ability to move through time and space in different dimensions. People who think aliens dropped Bigfoot off. I didn’t really do much with that side of the Bigfoot world, simply because a) I didn't have enough time and b) Magical Bigfoot is kind of hard to prove. If you throw magic into the equation then anything’s possible. So I really wanted to limit it to a more scientific approach, the kind of approach that my cousin had taken.

And within that world, I would say that most of the people seem pretty down to Earth. They’re not crazies or spouting off really weird things. A lot of them have had an experience that really changes their perception of the natural world. They’re usually nature enthusiasts. They like being outside, and a number of them have backgrounds in biology or wildlife biology or work for different wildlife organizations and agencies. It’s not what I expected to find, which was kind of complete nutjobs and people with no social skills.

Do you think that the search for Bigfoot holds any lessons about how science works?

I do think people are getting kind of an interesting crash course in what you might call citizen science, going out to the woods learning to identify different animal calls, learning to recognize the local flora and fauna, learning how to take a sample or cast a footprint or gather this kind of evidence in a way that is helpful for a lot of different scientific fields.

The first episode of “Wild Thing” premieres on Oct. 2. You can subscribe via iTunes, Stitcher, or your favorite podcasting app.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Wild Sound: A Q & A with Laura Krantz
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today