Atmospheric rivers: When it rains on the West Coast, it pours

Floating streams of water vapor known as 'atmospheric rivers' aka 'Pineapple Express' may be responsible for a majority of the worst coastal storms, according to a new study. 

Nic Coury/ Monterey County Weekly via AP
A man who lives in his RV, which was parked in the 300 block of Griffith Street in Salinas, Calif., walks through the flooded street on Mon., Feb. 20, 2016.

The Pineapple Express turns out to be less delicious than it sounds.

One of many streams of vapor flowing through the atmosphere, the Pineapple Express is an example of the weather phenomenon known as an “atmospheric river.” These relatively narrow bands play a major role in the transportation of water around the planet, bringing vast quantities of vapor from one place to another.

But in doing so, they can also wreak havoc when they make landfall and dump their cargo, causing flooding and extreme weather, according to a paper published Monday in Nature Geoscience.

Despite floating through the sky, these rivers easily outstrip their earthbound counterparts. Thousands of miles long and hundreds of miles wide, large atmospheric rivers can carry more than a dozen times the water of the Mississippi River at its mouth, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and account for up to half of the West Coast’s annual precipitation.

Their outsized impact on the West Coast can be both a blessing and a curse. This year, they’ve brought drought-stricken California some much needed good news, but also caused a lot of damage.

"This has been a very active winter, atmospheric river-wise," reported Jeff Zimmerman of the National Weather Service, according to NPR. "We've probably had 10 or more ... this winter."

The state isn't out of the woods quite yet, but the replenished snowpack may ease water restrictions. On the other hand, big storms have thrashed the state all winter, with the most recent on Monday.

California is no stranger to extreme precipitation events – it even lost an iconic sequoia to an atmospheric river storm in January – and the new research sheds light on why. Scientists have long known that atmospheric rivers can wallop communities with large floods when they make landfall, but study authors Duane Waliser and Bin Guan wanted to study exactly how the streams affected surface winds and rains.

To do so, they applied a new atmospheric river-recognizing algorithm to almost 20 years of weather data, from 1997 to 2014, to reach some surprising conclusions.

The duo found that the vapor ribbons are in fact quite windy, although they write that this result was “not completely unexpected,” given that wind is a necessary ingredient in the transport of water vapor up from the tropics.

What was more surprising was just how damaging atmospheric rivers could be. Atmospheric rivers appeared to be responsible for up to half of the top 2 percent of high-wind, high-precipitation weather events, inducing tempests likely to feature winds twice as strong as a standard storm.

California isn’t the only victim. Dr. Waliser was also able to connect many of Europe’s worst storms during the time period studied with atmospheric rivers.

Such storms' combination of wind and rain makes them incredibly costly. Over the last twenty years, 19 European storms caused a billion dollars or more in damage. "And so out of these 19 storms," Waliser told NPR, "we associated atmospheric rivers with 14 out of the 19."

Some hope a more detailed understanding of these remarkable weather patterns might help states be better prepared in the future.

The duo suggests that future studies analyze the behavior of atmospheric rivers more deeply and find out how they relate with “specific wind-related hazards, such as storm surge and coastal flooding, wind damage, marine weather and significant wave height.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.