From drought to floods, California staggers from one state of emergency to the next

Despite rising flood waters across California this week, the state's water regulator is not ready to lift the drought-mandated water conservation ban just yet.

Kent Porter/The Press Democrat/AP
A resident of Guerneville, Calif., ties up a kayak to his property, as flood waters from the Russian River surround his home on Jan. 11, 2017. Much of California has gone from withered to water-logged this winter, but the state's top water regulator is not ready to lift emergency conservation measures enacted during the height of the drought.

When it rains, it pours. In drought- and wildfire-scarred California, it also snows, hails, and gusts.

California Gov. Jerry Brown declared a state of emergency Monday in 50 out of California’s 58 counties, after a trio of winter storms brought a barrage of snow and rain that caused property damage, power outages, and four weather-related fatalities. Despite record-breaking precipitation, state officials fear the rains may not be enough to bring the years-long drought to a permanent close.

Some of the heaviest rains fell along the coast, where 3 to 4 inches fell in just six hours, shutting down roads and causing as many as 9,000 power outages in parts of Los Angeles and San Diego.

“Today was very intense,” said National Weather Service meteorologist Brett Albright to the Los Angeles Times on Sunday. “It’s not a normal event. It was definitely a culmination of the perfect circumstances: We had a very intense atmospheric river with a lot of moisture and an area of lift in the atmosphere right over coastal Los Angeles and Orange counties. It forced all of that moisture out.”

“It’s not often we see higher rainfall totals on the coast than in the mountains,” he continued.

But the mountains weren’t spared either, receiving heavy snowfall that closed schools and roads alike, triggering an avalanche and at least one roof collapse in Lake Tahoe. 

Rockslides also closed roads in Malibu, but few mudslides materialized. A number of communities in the area were evacuated, but the most of the hillsides remained mercifully intact as of Sunday night.

Mudslide fears had been heightened by vegetation loss after last year’s wildfires, since plant roots keep topsoil from sliding down slopes during a heavy rainfall. California’s half-decade drought has left more than 100 million trees dead, creating tinderbox-like conditions that have led to several years with massive wildfires.

In this respect, January’s storms hold some good news for the thirsty state. The AP reports that after a wetter-than-average 2016, the Sierra Nevada snowpack is almost twice as large as usual, and Los Angeles has already gotten a year’s worth of rain in just a few weeks.

But will it be enough for California to resume to water consumption as usual?

In 2014, Governor Brown declared a water emergency in early 2014, ordering residents to cut water usage by 25 percent statewide, which led to a number of unpopular water-saving measures such as restricting sprinkler usage and car washing.

Some wonder if the recent storms will prompt the government to lift restrictions, but so far, officials are playing it safe. Last February, water regulators took a wait and see attitude: “Every drop saved today is one that we may be very glad we have tomorrow,” said Felicia Marcus, chair of the state water control board, in February 2016, after an unusually wet January.

Now, water experts are warning that a short-term focus on a few rainy months risks ignoring an underlying danger: wells that continue to run dry.

Rainwater can take years to travel through soil and bedrock down to underground aquifers. “Just because we get a bunch of rain today doesn't mean it solved our problem,” said Mike Maggiora of Maggiora Bros. Drilling Inc., to the AP. Well-drilling companies have reportedly had to venture as deep as 2,000 feet to hit water in some areas.

California, which produces nearly 25 percent of the country’s food, relies heavily on groundwater for irrigation, which accounts for as much as 80 percent of the state’s water use.

Facing ever-more-permanent water conservation measures, people are adjusting to a "water-lite" lifestyle, in some places replacing lush grass with more drought-friendly plants. Maintaining lawns "takes a lot of water. It takes a lot of work," Lisa Libby, a college history instructor, told the AP. "I'm not sure in this environment that it's necessary."

Meanwhile, others are finding silver linings in the current storm in the form of recreation such as paddleboarding, rafting, and in one case, driving a personal watercraft through the streets.

For now, the ordeal seems to be over. Wednesday’s forecast for Los Angeles was 50 degrees and sunny.

This article contains material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.