As the snowpack piles up, is California's drought over? No, say experts.

New measurements of the Sierra Nevada snowpack show California's snowiest winter in 20 years. But it may be too soon for sweeping policy changes.

Rich Pedroncelli/AP
Frank Gehrke, chief of the California Cooperative Snow Surveys Program for the Department of Water Resources, crosses a snow-covered meadow after conducting the second manual snow survey of the season at Phillips Station on Thursday.

Though heightened snowpack in California’s Sierra Nevada is cause for optimism, reducing water use remains as important as ever, scientists say.

On Thursday, the state’s snowpack in the mountain region reached 173 percent of average for that date. That’s the highest it’s been since 1995, thanks to a series of storms that bombarded California in January. Come spring, the snowpack will melt into 5.7 trillion gallons of water, enough for as much of a third of the state.

“It gives everything a much brighter outlook,” said Frank Gehrke, California’s snow survey chief, the Associated Press reported. Does the heavy rain- and snowfall signal a change in the way that California will approach its years-long drought?

As California Gov. Jerry Brown weighs ending the drought-related state of emergency this spring, farmers and city governments are calling for more water. But scientists caution that the drought is a long-term problem that won't be fixed by one season of heavy precipitation, and they advise officials to stay the course.

“Any aquifer recharge that occurs as a result of this winter's storms is just a small uptick in a century-long decline of groundwater storage, at least with respect to the once-vast reserves in the Central Valley," said James Famiglietti, a senior water scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, according to the LA Times.

But farmers and residents tired of the water restrictions point to the snowpack levels as proof that California has come full circle. In January 2014, Governor Brown stood at Phillips Station, a snowpack-measuring area in the Sierra Nevada to declare a state of emergency. On that day, there was no snow at all, a symbol of the intensity of the drought. Three years later, the snowpack at Phillips station is the equivalent of 28.1 inches of water, AP reported.

In April 2015, citing the state of emergency, Brown asked cities to reduce their water use to 75 percent of 2013 levels, and followed that up with reductions preventing farmers from taking surface water. Understandably, farmers and cities that have been affected by water-conservation efforts might like more water now that it seems to be plentiful again.

But while a study by the University of Colorado-Boulder and NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory recently determined that the snowpack had filled more than a third of California’s “snow-water deficit,” the snow statistics are not a reason for a policy overhaul, scientists say.

Why? Because the high-piled snow is just a small part of the state’s overall water outlook, Jay Lund, director of the Center for Watershed Sciences at the University of California-Davis, told the LA Times. Most of the problem, he explained, lies with underground wells and basins.

"That's where the deficit is really concentrated,” Professor Lund said. “Every time [consumers] didn't have enough water, they pumped.”

And while the snow runoff will help address this water shortage, it can only fill underground basins that lie along its path from the mountains to the sea.

On top of that, the years of drought California has experienced means it may take time to restore normal conditions, as The Christian Science Monitor’s Jason Thomson explained on Thursday:

“When land is cracked and devoid of moisture, torrents of rain are not easily absorbed. Instead, they cascade across the surface, bringing floods and mudslides in their wake.”

If this is the first of several wet winters, then things are looking up. In view of the changing climate, however, conservationists suggest that this is the time to double down on water-reduction policies, in order to secure a sustainable future for the state.

In an announcement about California’s progress toward meeting water-conservation targets on Tuesday, state officials seemed to agree.

"We're at halftime," said State Water Resources Control Board chair Felicia Marcus. "We're not doing too badly, but we certainly haven't won the game yet."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to As the snowpack piles up, is California's drought over? No, say experts.
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today