What we can learn from watching video of coral lose its color

For the first time, Australian researchers have caught coral bleaching on camera.

Scientists have long warned of coral bleaching events, but few knew the phenomenon could be so violent.

Last week, researchers from the Queensland University of Technology described the first-ever video of coral bleaching in the journal Coral Reefs. They found that under simulated warming conditions, solitary mushroom coral called Heliofungia actiniformis will swell and squeeze, dramatically expelling their algal tenants. The eight-day time-lapse video, which is making the rounds on the internet this week, brings coral to life for viewers who may be more accustomed to thinking about reefs as habitats rather than animals and bleaching as a passive event.

“When you actually show the coral going through these physical efforts, it is a much more vivid way of conveying the science to the public,” says Andréa Grottoli, a professor of earth sciences at Ohio State University, in a phone interview with The Christian Science Monitor. “It adds emotional content to something we know.”

The relationship between coral and algae is a prime example of symbiosis in the animal world. Coral polyps provide a perfect protective home for tiny zooxanthellae algae. In exchange, the photosynthetic algae provide nutrients and color to their (naturally colorless) coral landlords.

But if sea temperatures rise even a few degrees over the normal thermal maximum, corals will begin to expel algae from their bodies and turn white. The whole bleaching process can take as few as 10 days.

“One of the things the video clearly shows is how the ejection of the symbionts is this coordinated, whole animal event,” says Emily Rivest, an incoming assistant professor at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, in a phone interview with the Monitor. “We didn’t have a detailed understanding of how that beneficial relationship [between coral and algae] breaks down on the mechanical level.”

Algae will return to their hosts if temperatures cool. If the heat doesn’t let up, bleached coral may die. And as climate warming shows no sign of slowing, researchers fear the worst for coral ecosystems.

“Temperature is the single largest stressor facing modern coral reefs, and we are seeing annual bleaching events,” says Dr. Grottoli, who is also head of Ohio State’s Water, Climate and Environment division. “This wasn’t predicted to occur for several decades, but it’s happening now. So that raises the alarm for me.”

Climate change presents a distinctly long-term challenge for conservationists. But marine scientists are already working toward short-term solutions for maintaining coral health.

“The easiest [factors] to control are local sources of stress,” says Dr. Rivest. “Nutrient runoff, sediment runoff from rivers and streams, managing how many fish there are to control algae from overgrowing.”

And by better understanding the mechanics behind bleaching, researchers could target conservation efforts where they count the most.

“There are things that can buy time for coral reefs,” Grottoli says. “We know that reefs that are protected or isolated from human impact tend to recover more quickly from bleaching. And even on bleached reefs, there are some colonies that don’t bleach. So we’re trying to identify what makes those individual corals resilient when other individuals are bleaching.”

In a previous study led by Grottoli, researchers found that coral with higher fat reserves were better able to survive and bounce back from bleaching events. In a different paper, Australian researchers theorized that coral microbiomes could hold clues to saving reef ecosystems.

“The next step is to look through that kind of microbial soup and find which bacteria may be the beneficial ones, understand how they're responding under temperature changes, and what contributions they're making to the coral,” Tracy Ainsworth, a molecular biologist at Australia's James Cook University, told the Monitor's Eva Botkin-Kowacki.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.