Why healthy coral reefs need fish urine

In a new study, marine scientists found a surprising consequence of overfishing: as fish populations dwindle, coral loses an essential nutrient – fish pee.

PRNewsFoto/The Pew Charitable Trusts/File
Many fish species call Easter Island's coral reefs home. The waters host 27 threatened species listed on the International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List, and 10 of these are in critical condition. A new study connects fish urine to healthy coral reefs in the Caribbean.

One fish’s waste is a coral reef’s wealth.

It’s no secret that overfishing can diminish biodiversity in marine ecosystems. But in a study published Tuesday in the journal Nature Communications, researchers found a second consequence: as fish populations dwindle, coral loses an essential nutrient – fish urine.

“Part of the reason coral reefs work is because animals play a big role in moving nutrients around,” Jacob Allgeier, an ecologist at the University of Washington, said in a statement. “Fish hold a large proportion, if not most of the nutrients in a coral reef in their tissue, and they’re also in charge of recycling them. If you take the big fish out, you’re removing all of those nutrients from the ecosystem.”

Coral reefs are an important resource for large-bodied fish in the Caribbean. They use the reef for shelter during the day, and as a hunting ground by night. Recent studies have shown that coral reefs rely on fish, too. Fish excrete ammonium, an essential nutrient for coral growth, through their gills. And fish urine contains phosphorus, another key nutrient.

But it was unclear exactly how crucial fish were to the nutrient flow of reef ecosystems. To find out, Dr. Allgeier led a team of researchers to survey nearly 150 fish species at 43 different Caribbean coral reefs. Each site had experienced varying degrees of fishing impact, with some untouched and others decimated.

They found that, at sites where predatory fish thrived, the coral reefs had healthy nutrient levels. Reefs with fewer fish lacked necessary nutrients by as much as 50 percent.

“Simply stated, fish biomass in coral reefs is being reduced by fishing pressure. If biomass is shrinking, there are fewer fish to pee,” Allgeier said in a statement.

The new research will allow greater understanding of the different ways fishing affects coral reef ecosystems, Allgeier said, inspiring more nuanced conservation efforts.

In recent years, the roles of animal waste and nutrient flow in marine ecosystems have become increasingly clear. In 2015, Australian marine scientists identified “predictors of resilience” in coral reefs – that is, factors that help reefs survive large bleaching events. Among them, they noted density of coral polyps had a significant impact. These organisms form a close partnership with tiny algae, which line the polyps’ digestive tract. The algae provide organic compounds, which allow the coral to build huge calcium carbonate structures.

And what do the algae get in return? Nutrients, in the form of coral waste.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.