What is Pamela Anderson doing lobbying the Kremlin?

The 'Baywatch' celebrity visited Moscow this week to urge officials to protect wild animals.

Chris Pizzello/AP
Pamela Anderson, recipient of the 'Vegan of the Year' award, poses at the 2015 Last Chance for Animals Annual Benefit in Beverly Hills last month.

Former “Baywatch” star and PETA supporter Pamela Anderson visited the Kremlin on Monday to urge Russian leaders to better protect wild animals.

In a meeting with Vladimir Putin’s chief of staff, Sergei Ivanov, which was televised on state-owned news channel RT, Ms. Anderson talked about the need for conservation of the endangered Amur (or Siberian) tigers, asked the Kremlin to uphold laws banning the hunting of harp seals in the White Sea and on the import of their skins, and asked for the government to end orca captivity.

"I think Russia could really win over some hearts and minds in the West if Russia were to take a leadership position on defending wildlife and the rights of animals," Anderson said at the meeting on Monday, Agence France-Presse reported.

"Russia has proven to be a nation unafraid to take undaunted action where action is needed," she said.

The actress and model has lent her name to a variety of causes. She has urged officials in her home province of British Columbia in Canada to stop culling wolves, pressured M.A.C. cosmetics to stop testing on animals, and offered to pay for 30 life-sized faux elephants so that the Indian state of Kerala would use them instead of live elephants in a popular parade.  

This is Anderson’s second visit to Russia this fall. In September, she attended an economic forum in the country’s eastern city of Vladivostok at the invitation of Russian Natural Resources Minister Sergei Donskoi, according to The Moscow Times, which reports that the American star is very popular in Russia for her role as a lifeguard in the 1990s American television show "Baywatch."

During this week’s trip, she criticized Russia for keeping orca whales at an aquarium in Moscow that opened in August.

"I don't think any whales should be in captivity," said Anderson. "I'm very surprised that they have captured these animals and hopefully they will be set free into the wild."

Anderson and celebrities like Harry Styles and Matt Damon joined PETA in protesting SeaWorld in San Diego in November. The company faced public protests and a dip in visitors after a 2013 documentary, called "Blackfish," accused it of mistreating killer whales at its parks.

“I think people who care would never go to SeaWorld,” she said in a video at a demonstration in California last month. “So don’t go to SeaWorld,” she instructed.

Succumbing to public and financial pressure, SeaWorld CEO Joel Manby announced last month a plan to phase out controversial orca whale shows at its San Diego park by 2017, The Christian Science Monitor reported.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.