SeaWorld ends controversial orca shows: Why activists want more

SeaWorld in San Diego will end its killer whale shows by 2017, opting for a more natural show. But activists say that change is not enough.

Chris Park/AP/File
Four killer whales, including Kasatka and her calf, Kalia, leap out of the water while performing during SeaWorld's Shamu show in San Diego in 2006. A SeaWorld executive says orca shows at the company's San Diego park will end by 2017. CEO Joel Manby cited customer feedback as the reason for the move in an announcement Monday to investors. Manby said the park would offer a different kind of orca experience and focus on the animal's natural setting and behaviors.

SeaWorld announced Monday that the controversial orca shows would end at its San Diego park – and activists cheered.

But the applause quickly faded as the details emerged. 

SeaWorld Entertainment Inc. plans to phase out the current orca show – one that features killer whales flipping, splashing, and doing other stunts on cue – by 2017. The old show, that began in the 1960s, will be replaced by one more in line with the whales’ natural behaviors and environment, SeaWorld CEO Joel Manby told investors.

Mr. Manby hopes that shift will help appease disgruntled customers. ”They want the orca experience to be activities the whales do in the wild," he told the Associated Press. "Things they perceive as tricks, they don't like as well."

But, he hinted, this change will not be “universal across our properties.” SeaWorld’s other parks, in San Antonio and Orlando, will continue to run the iconic killer whale show.

Even at the San Diego park the change is not enough for activists.

Much more needs to be done,” California Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff told The San Diego Union-Tribune. “I would urge the company to curtail the breeding of their orcas and partner in the creation of ocean sanctuaries.”

Representative Schiff plans to put forth federal legislation to ban breeding of captive orcas.

"The fact still remains that as long as SeaWorld holds orcas in captivity, the physical and psychological problems associated with their captivity will persist," Schiff told the Associated Press.

California state Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez (D) of San Diego told the Union-Tribune, “Today’s acknowledgement by SeaWorld does not end our push to halt inhumane orca captivity and breeding practices, but it’s a step in the right direction.”

The iconic “Shamu” killer whale show drew many tourists in the 1970s, skyrocketing SeaWorld to success. But the documentary “Blackfish” cast a shadow on that popularity.

The film, released in 2013, looked at the impact of captivity on orcas, focusing particularly on the story of Tilikum and trainer Dawn Brancheau, who died after the killer whale pulled her into a pool in 2010 at the Orlando park.

The popular documentary sparked outrage from animal rights activists, led to boycotts and to legislation that would curb SeaWorld's orca exhibit. 

With such bad press, it’s no surprise SeaWorld has been struggling financially. 

As of Monday, the company's stock price was down 54 percent from a peak in May 2013. The Union-Tribune reports that profit had fallen by 75 percent from the previous 12-month period from June to June.

The Los Angeles Times published an editorial adding to the growing narrative that SeaWorld’s announcement Monday is not enough. 

The LA Times editorial staff writes

SeaWorld would be better off ending its breeding program, allowing its orca population to die out naturally — which would still give it decades of exhibition — and reserving its tanks for injured animals that cannot survive in the wild....

The documentary "Blackfish," dismissed as inaccurate by the company, has nonetheless strengthened a growing public sense that keeping orcas in captivity is wrong. Attendance at the marine park has been down, and it's unclear whether paying customers will buy the idea that a killer whale in a nicer-looking tank is contented, any more than they bought Sea World's assertion that the performing orcas were willing and happy collaborators in their training and shows for big — though shrinking — crowds.

This report includes material from the Associated Press.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.