AP Photo
In this photo released by Press Information Department, India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi, right, reviews a guard of honor with his Pakistani counterpart Nawaz Sharif in Lahore, Pakistan, Dec. 25. Modi arrived in Pakistan on Friday, his first visit as prime minister to this Islamic nation that has been India's long-standing archrival.

A bright hope for 2016: India and Pakistan reconcile

A surprise visit on Christmas Day between the leaders of India and Pakistan hint at a mutual desire to no longer let historic tensions hinder their drive against poverty.

One of the most hopeful events in 2015 was a surprise visit on Christmas Day between the prime ministers of India and Pakistan, Narendra Modi and Nawaz Sharif. Their power lunch showed a spirit of generosity for the leaders of two nuclear powers so long at odds that South Asia is viewed as the most dangerous place on earth.

While one summit does not make peace, the visit hints that the two countries may now be able to transcend difficult issues of territory, terrorism, religious divide, and national identity.

One possible motivation for the sudden warmth: Both leaders may empathize with the other about the urgent need to tackle poverty rather than allow tensions to hinder economic growth. As the rest of the world has moved toward interdependence, Pakistan and India have remained mired in post-colonial quarrels for 68 years, a result of an awkward and violent partition of the Indian subcontinent in 1947.

If the visit leads to further progress in 2016, such as expanded cross-border trade and people-to-people exchanges, the event could go down in history like the warming of relations between Germany and France after World War II. Formal talks between India and Pakistan are due to start in January.

The Dec. 25 visit was not the first time that leaders of the two countries have met. But these two were particularly friendly, holding hands, sharing gifts, and smiling while talking at the home of Mr. Sharif in Lahore during his birthday celebration and his granddaughter’s wedding. Over the past year, their diplomats have laid the groundwork for possible rapprochement, making concessions on a few key issues.

Pakistan’s military, for example, has awakened to the threat from any terrorist group, especially after a large-scale attack on an Army school for children last year. And India appears far more willing to work with its smaller neighbors than to dominate them.

Suspicions remain, of course, driven largely by jingoists, military hawks, and opportunistic politicians in each country. Yet with a past steeped in Hindu nationalism, Modi’s unusual outreach to Pakistan could reduce domestic backlash. In Pakistan, meanwhile, a powerful military and an elected civilian leadership may finally be in sync on foreign policy.

Both countries are eager to improve investments and take advantage of strategic shifts in Central Asia. Peace seems possible in Afghanistan, for example. Sanctions on Iran may soon be lifted. And China is investing heavily in the region. India and Pakistan want to share in new energy pipelines from their petroleum-rich neighbors. Their economies, each with different strengths, would benefit by an opening of bilateral trade.

But more than matching up selfish interests, India and Pakistan need to embrace common values and build on a shared culture and history. The warmth of the Modi-Sharif visit shows what is possible.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to A bright hope for 2016: India and Pakistan reconcile
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today