China’s handshake with Taiwan: A dragon lies down with a lamb

A historic summit between the presidents of Taiwan and China may be Beijing’s recognition that the Taiwanese prefer civic principles like freedom over ethnic or cultural ties.

Leader of Taiwan's main opposition Democratic Progressive Party, Tsai Ing-wen, gives a speech in Taipei Nov. 4, criticizing the planned meeting between China's and Taiwan's leaders set for Saturday in Singapore.

When Nikita Khrushchev became the first Soviet head of state to visit the United States in 1959, he surprised his hosts by saying he wanted “peaceful coexistence.” When Egyptian leader Anwar Sadat became the first Arab leader to visit Israel in 1977, he initiated a peace deal that remains a model for the Middle East. When President Obama shook hands with Cuban leader Raúl Castro at Nelson Mandela’s funeral in 2013, it led to a thaw in a half century of cool relations.

We cite these examples of historic meetings as a hopeful context for this weekend’s summit in Singapore between President Xi Jinping of China and Taiwan’s president, Ma Ying-jeou. The top leaders of these two countries have never met, a result of a split in 1949 when Communist forces under Mao Zedong took over the mainland and drove the Nationalist army of Chiang Kai-shek to flee to Taiwan. Each side still claims the island as theirs. Each keeps its militaries at the ready. Yet now after 66 years, China’s leader is eager for a summit. Why?

Mr. Xi’s motives are up for speculation. Does he want to prevent the people of Taiwan from drifting further away from the official idea of eventual reunification with the mainland? If so, he aims to influence Taiwan’s coming election, which is expected to be won by a party that could declare formal independence. The sophisticated voters of Taiwan will probably see Xi’s meddling for what it is.

Or is the summit part of a campaign to soften China’s image after its recent aggressive claims to many other islands in East Asia? China’s stumbling economy badly needs reforms as well as investments from its neighbors, including Taiwan. Peace overtures may help Xi change China’s image, even its direction.

In a region where symbols can serve as substance, the summit sends a signal that China is open to change. Perhaps Xi is ready to acknowledge that Taiwan has proved democracy can thrive in a Chinese culture – and that its people embrace civic principles like freedom over ethnic or cultural ties to the mainland. (Nearly two-thirds of the island’s residents see themselves as Taiwanese, not Chinese.)

China’s ruling Communist Party need not fear a Confucian democracy or Taiwan’s de facto independence. It has 1.35 billion people to worry about. Not Taiwan’s 23 million. As communist ideology has lost favor, the party need not resort to chauvinism. Xi’s outstretched hand to Taiwan should be one of friendship. If this summit proves to be historic, it must lead to a permanent peace.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to China’s handshake with Taiwan: A dragon lies down with a lamb
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today