Talks with the Taliban: Can Afghanistan set an example?

The Afghan government held its first-ever talks with the Taliban, and if a second round occurs in coming days, a strong precedent may be set for negotiating peace with violent Islamic groups.

AP Photo
Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, right, speaks as Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif listens during a May 12 press conference in Kabul, Afghanistan.

The usual Western strategy for dealing with Islamic terrorists is to kill them. President Obama vows to crush Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. The United States helps African nations repel groups like Boko Haram. It uses drones to strike Al Qaeda operatives in any country. “Negotiations cannot convince Al Qaeda’s leaders to lay down their arms,” Mr. Obama stated in 2009.

But on July 7, the Afghan government held its first-ever talks with the Taliban with the assistance of the US, Pakistan, and China. The talks were held outside Islamabad, Pakistan. A second set of talks is planned in coming days, if conditions can be met for further negotiations. The realities in and around Afghanistan point to the possibility of a negotiated peace for a country torn by decades of war, most of it driven by Islamic radical groups.

High hurdles remain for a deal between the government of President Ashraf Ghani and the often-divided Taliban. Pakistan plays a big role while China brings a new mediating role. The Afghan Army must better show its mettle as a cohesive fighting force. Obama may need to recalculate his planned withdrawal of US forces.

Most of all, the Taliban must be convinced that their vision for Afghanistan would best be achieved without force and within the framework of the country’s constitutional democracy. The very fact that the group’s leaders are now willing to engage in negotiations shows an understanding of the need to use persuasion rather than bombs and bullets to achieve political results.

The West’s 14-year effort to build a pluralistic Afghanistan, especially in honoring women’s rights, may be paying off. Afghans are gaining a stronger national identity, the best defense against the Taliban. Last year’s election of Mr. Ghani, a pragmatic former World Bank official, may have been a game changer.

Another factor is in play. The Taliban are worried that Islamic State has gained a toehold in Afghanistan, challenging what little legitimacy the Taliban still hold. If this competition between violent Islamist groups results in one group using dialogue to end the conflict, then a model may be set for elsewhere, such as in the Middle East. The usual strategy of killing could eventually be unusual.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.