Obama as Cuba's Internet provider

Formal talks on US-Cuba ties started Wednesday, with President Obama insisting on Cubans being given access to the Internet. He is right to see the Internet as the people's searchlight for freedom – despite his doubts about 'democracy promotion.'

AP Photo
Members of a US delegation, right, and Cuban delegates, left, sit across from each other as they begin negotiations in Havana, Cuba, Jan. 21.

The great power of the Internet and smart phones is in their ability to connect people with shared values and interests – instantly, and across any borders that might divide people. These virtual communities have become a force in world affairs, either for good, such as during the Arab Spring, or for ill, such as Islamic State’s recruitment of fighters. Not surprisingly, almost every nation has yet to come to grips with this digital dynamo of collaboration.

President Obama’s faith in the Internet as a force for good was cemented during the 2008 election. His campaign team set a model in how to mobilize popular support over the Web. And even though he entered office as a critic of “democracy promotion” by the United States, he now insists that Cuba’s Castro regime provide open Internet access for its people as a condition for normalizing diplomatic relations. Formal talks to establish ties after five decades of estrangement began on Wednesday in Havana.

Cuba is the least-wired country in Latin America, and ranks with China and Iran in its restrictions on freedom of the Internet and other telecommunications. Its authoritarian leaders fear an uprising if Cubans can more easily organize. Pro-democracy revolts have long relied on communication tools such as pamphlets or telephones. But recent protests, such as those in Tunisia, Hong Kong, and Ukraine, were able to spring up quickly and in larger numbers because of the special abilities of the Internet and cellphones.

Cuba’s regime also worries that a greater flow of ideas over the Internet will undercut its propaganda about the quality of life in the island nation. The sunshine of truth might also better expose the many abuses of the regime, such as corruption and its treatment of political prisoners.

Mr. Obama’s pressure on Cuba is important not only for Cuba. For the fourth consecutive year, Internet freedom has declined around the world, according to the nonprofit advocacy group Freedom House, as more governments block or filter the Web, or arrest those who use the Internet for dissent.

Democracy promotion has gone out of favor to some degree since the Iraq War, and as more despots learn how to suppress groups agitating for freedom. But the Internet remains a compelling instrument for “soft power.” It rests on the hope that openness, transparency, and the flow of ideas create a moral arc of progress. Cuba is the next test ground for this hope. Obama should not waver in assisting Cubans in finally getting connected to the world.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.