Pizza Hut reports slumping sales. Is the love affair with the popular pie over?

Pizza Hut struggles to keep up with competitors in a rapidly evolving fast food market. 

Courtesy of Pizza Hut/AP/File
Pizza Hut is facing slumping sales as competition from other pizza chains, ready made food, and the rise in delivery apps eats into their customer base.

Those expectations of strong pizza sales turned out to be pie in the sky.

Yum Brands Inc., owner of fast food titans Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, and KFC, reported lower-than-expected fourth-quarter revenue, dragged down by poor pie performance. While established Taco Bell and KFC restaurants brought in 3 percent more than the previous quarter, Pizza Hut's revenue fell by 2 percent, leaving overall growth at 1 percent rather than the predicted 2.1 percent.

Fast-food and restaurant chains in general are facing increased competition from convenience stores, supermarkets, and delivery services, as well as the challenge of catering to increasingly sophisticated customers. 

"KFC and Taco Bell had relatively strong performance in December, despite difficult US industry conditions," Chief Financial Officer David Gibbs said in prepared remarks. "This momentum has continued into the new year."

Those difficult conditions? Competition on all fronts. In the pizza market, Pizza Hut’s same-store sales have been essentially flat since 2015, while rivals Domino's and Papa Johns have carved out niches focusing on delivery robots and a reputation for quality ingredients, respectively.

Yum Brands also struggled with its operations in China, where a meat supplier got caught violating regulations, and consumers increasingly prefer more wholesome options, leading Yum to spin off its China branch.

Moreover, the growing popularity of smartphone-based delivery apps threatens to do to fast food what Amazon did to Barnes and Noble. Last year takeout was already bringing in $70 billion annually, proving that for many people an additional fee is worth paying to avoid the hassle of visiting a restaurant in person.

That whopper of a figure has not escaped the notice of Silicon Valley, with a number of startups trying to capitalize on the trend. Chicago-based GrubHub offers to bring food from tens of thousands of restaurants to your door in hundreds of cities, and recently announced deliveries up 27 percent over last quarter. Amazon’s trying something similar with Amazon Restaurants. Food and grocery delivery startups gobbled up $5.4 billion in investments in 2015, a billion more than digital health-care companies, according to The Boston Globe.  

Transportation giant Uber is jumping into the fray as well. UberEats promises to harness its ubiquitous network of "independent contractors" to drive food from restaurants to hungry consumers, and is slowly rolling out the service city by city.

But fast food chains aren’t going down without a fight. Dunkin’ Donuts, McDonald's, and even Yum property Taco Bell have all experimented with delivery services in the past two years.

Of course, Pizza Hut is no stranger to delivery, but the explosion of competitors is pressuring them to find a way to stand out from the pack as Papa John’s and Domino’s have.

The glut of options available to peckish consumers allows them more choice than ever before in selecting food that matches their lifestyles. A recent survey asked 1,300 professional chefs what trends were on the rise, and they identified a number of concept-based ideas such as local sourcing and environmental sustainability as “hot.”

Meanwhile, a beleaguered Pizza Hut has no choice but to keep trying to innovate its way out of the slump, despite the 2014 unveiling of a new menu with new flavors such as curry and sriracha that chief marketing officer Carrie Walsh told CNBC “push the envelope.”

This report contains materials from Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.