Mars Inc., buys another animal hospital chain as candy sales drop

As sales of packaged foods decline, the booming pet foods and services sector has attracted global food companies.

Diane Bondareff/Invision for Banfield Pet Hospital/AP
Quvenzhane Wallis, star of the musical film “Annie,” her four-legged co-star Sandy, and Dr. Ari Zabell, of Banfield Pet Hospital, read aloud from Banfield’s first-ever children’s book, “My Very, Very Busy Day,” at a book launch event at the Children’s Museum of Manhattan, on Wednesday, Oct. 15, 2014, in New York. Banfield's parent company, Mars Inc., has announced it will also aquire VCA Inc., a Los Angeles-based pet hospital chain.

Mars Inc., the century-old, global company best known for making M&Ms and Skittles, on Monday said it will buy a Los Angeles-based chain of animal hospitals, VCA Inc.

The $7.7 billion deal, not including debt, will expand the company’s pet-products portfolio, which already includes Portland, Ore.-based pet hospital chain Banfield Pet Hospitals, and pet-food brands Whiskas, Pedigree, and Royal Canin. Pet-focused products are already the second largest contributor to the candymaker’s $35 billion annual revenue, as Bloomberg points out.

At a time when sales of candy, soda, and other junk foods are declining, the pet food and services business offers immense rewards. According to the American Pet Products Association, pet owners spent about $60 billion on their beloved furry companions in 2015. Spending on pet food, supplies, and veterinary care has grown by about 4 percent annually in recent years, the pet products association estimates.

"Why double down on food when it's not growing that fast?" Ken Shea, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, told Ad Age.

It’s no surprise then that packaged-food companies including Mars, which also makes Uncle Ben’s rice and Dolmio pasta sauce, Nestlé (the company behind Nescafé and KitKat), and jellymaker J.M. Smucker are vying for a share of the lucrative pet market. Mars already owned about one-fifth of the global pet food and care industry before Monday’s acquisition announcement, according to Bloomberg.

Meanwhile, packaged-food sales have been on the decline amid growing awareness and concerns about the sodium and sugar content of processed foods. “Over the last several decades, really since the Second World War, heavily processed or packaged foods – more convenient foods – were embraced by moms-at-home and women wanting to get into the workforce,” Alexia Howard, a food analyst at business research firm Bernstein, told Marketplace in March 2015. But these days working parents have a world of nutrition information at their fingertips, so sales of such quick-to-prepare products as Jell-O and TV dinners have been declining, she says.

As increasing consumer awareness about food ingredients and nutrition has steered food companies toward a market of less picky, four-legged eaters, it has also motivated fast-food brands, and candy and soda manufacturers, to turn their attention to the profitable business of making more healthful foods for humans. Nestlé's nutrition and health revenue grew 25 percent from 2013 to 2015, for example, while its confectionery revenue dropped 14 percent, reports Business Insider.

These kinds of numbers have helped push companies such as Nestlé, and also Mars, to promise to cut sodium from their foods. Mars, Pepsi, and Kellogg’s have committed publicly to limit sugar in their products in order to maintain international nutritional guidelines. Taco Bell already has cut sodium levels in its food by 15 percent, according to USA Today. And fast-food chains such as Papa John’s, Pizza Hut, and Subway have said they will cut artificial ingredients from their food, reports Business Insider.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.