Kerry seeks 'inclusive' leadership from Iraqi PM as ISIS insurgency spreads

Secretary of State John Kerry arrived in Baghdad after stops in Jordan and Egypt amid accusations by Iran's supreme leader that the US was meddling in Iraqi politics. 

Brendan Smialowski/AP
US Secretary of State John Kerry, left, meets with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki at the Prime Minister's office in Baghdad on Monday, June 23, 2014.

US Secretary of State John Kerry arrived in Baghdad today in an effort to persuade Iraq's embattled prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, "to be inclusive and share power" in order to shore up Iraq's resistance to Sunni insurgents sweeping across the country. 

Mr. Kerry, who visited Cairo and Amman, Jordan, on Sunday, suggested to reporters that US support for Mr. Maliki was ebbing, as the Shiite prime minister's sectarian policies have alienated Iraq's Sunnis, who in turn have supported the extremist Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, or ISIS. Kerry told reporters in Cairo that "The United States would like to see the Iraqi people find leadership that is prepared to represent all of the people of Iraq," reports Agence France-Presse.

Reuters notes that Kerry denied that the US was seeking to choose Iraq's leadership, a charge made on Sunday by Iranian supreme leader Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. "The United States is not engaged in picking or choosing or advocating for any one individual, or series of individuals, to assume the leadership of Iraq," Kerry said. "That is up to the Iraqi people and we have made that clear since day one."

Voice of America adds that the secretary of state will meet with senior Sunni and Kurdish officials as well.

Despite Washington's frustration with Maliki, The Christian Science Monitor's Dan Murphy notes that "Iraqis are actual people, with their own interests, not clay dolls ready to have US interests and demands imprinted upon them." Mr. Murphy writes that the US has had little leverage over Maliki since engineering his path to power, and that is not going to change quickly, even with ISIS on the march.

While the collapse of Iraq's army in much of the northern half of the country – and the loss of cities and towns like Mosul and Tikrit, and the oil refining center of Baiji, just north of Baghdad – may give the US some leverage over Maliki, he may not be inclined to commit political suicide. He already mobilized Shiite militias to fight the Sunni Arab uprising, and the political lesson he drew from the uprising appears to be that he was not tough enough. ...

The US brought the current Iraqi government to power, promised it would respect Iraq's sovereignty, and now finds that controlling Iraqi politics is well beyond its ability. That was something agreed to long ago.

The Monitor's Scott Peterson, reporting from Baghdad, adds that the Sunnis alienated by Maliki have been quick to back ISIS. But former leaders of Iraq's Sunni Awakening – a network of Iraqi Sunnis who, with US support, helped the Iraqi government beat back Al Qaeda in Iraq seven years ago – say that may be due to a lack of awareness of ISIS’ violent methods.

[Former Awakening fighter] Abu Omar says his relatives in areas captured by ISIS are “wrong” to be “happy because ISIS told them they will remove injustice.” They instead compiled computer databases of every one who has worked for the government, “and they won’t stop killing them,” he predicts.

Relatives in Mosul “never saw [ISIS] killing people,” just organizing services to help, says Abu Omar. “This is a good thing, to win people’s loyalty, to show the people of Mosul the nice face, and with this loyalty they will brainwash people to get some fighters with them.”

The secretary's visit comes as ISIS controls a huge swath of territory across both Iraq and Syria, and has begun to menace Jordan as well. On Sunday, ISIS forces captured the Iraqi-Jordanian border crossing of Turaibil, after government forces fled the site, the Associated Press reports. The seizure cuts off Baghdad's primary land route to Jordan.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.