Israel declines invitation to Paris Middle East peace conference

Israel rejected an invitation from France to a Middle East peace conference in Paris later this year, saying that it wanted to engage in direct talks with the Palestinians.

Abir Sultan/AP
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu chairs the weekly cabinet meeting at his office in Jerusalem on Sunday.

Israel formally rejected Monday an invitation to join France’s forthcoming international conference on Middle East peace, saying it would distract from the goal of direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians.

The summit, planned for Paris in December, seeks to reinvigorate the pursuit of peace, stalled ever since the last round of US-led negotiations collapsed in April 2014.

Israel has already been scornful of the French proposal, with one official comparing the conference to the Sykes-Picot agreement of 1916, whereby France and Britain carved up the Middle East following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. But Monday’s meeting in Jerusalem between Israeli officials and French envoy Pierre Vimont was the first time the plan had received official rejection.

“It was made clear to the French envoy that Israel will not participate in any international conference convened contrary to its position,” read a statement from the Israeli prime minister’s office. The press release continues by saying that such a conference would only serve to allow the Palestinians to “continue avoiding the decision to enter into direct negotiations without preconditions.”

For their part, French officials have said the conference will proceed, and, according to Reuters, a spokesperson for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said they welcomed the proposal “whether Israel participates or not.”

The conference in December is the latest in a series of efforts by France to stimulate real progress, and it comes after a preliminary gathering in June which brought together the United Nations, the European Union, the United States, and major Arab nations to consider various proposals. Neither Israel nor the Palestinians were invited.

In declining their invitation for the follow-up conference, the Israelis also expressed their concern that such an international gathering would provide a forum for the Palestinians to seek attention rather than engage in meaningful discussions aimed at finding solutions. Others see in Israel’s rejection a lost opportunity to prove to the world that they are serious in their desire for a settlement to the decades-old conflict.

“If the Israeli government would decide to come to such a conference,” Mr. Vimont told the Jerusalem Post, “it would be a perfect arena so that everyone, at last, would think that the commitment by the Israeli government to a two-state solution is genuine, sincere and deeply based and grounded in strong convictions.”

While some analysts worry that the possibility of finding a two-state solution may be fading, others maintain that should key stumbling blocks be addressed – namely Israel’s continued expansion of its settlement-building program, and divisions within the Palestinian political class – such a deal could yet be clinched.

This report contains material from the Associated Press and Reuters.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Israel declines invitation to Paris Middle East peace conference
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today