Israelis and Palestinians: 12 voices on the future

The Mideast conflict is not doomed to stalemate. A wide spectrum of Israelis and Palestinians are implementing their vision for the future without waiting for their leaders – or a peace deal.

7. ‘Called to be a holy nation’ – Religious Zionist rabbi

Ann Hermes/Staff
Rabbi Dovid Ben Meir sees Israel annexing the West Bank, extending equal legal rights to Palestinians, and investing in the Arab economy and infrastructure.

Of all the people I interviewed about where they see themselves in 20 years, Rabbi Dovid Ben Meir answered the most quickly: “Amman.”

Not because a guy with a yarmulke, long beard, and the tassels worn by religious men is dreaming of a vacation in the Jordanian capital.

No, he has another dream: that Israeli sovereignty will one day stretch to the Jordan River and even beyond. It’s a dream that drove him, the son of Holocaust survivors, to leave Chicago at age 17 and never use the return portion of his ticket.

Then he hesitates: reaching Amman may be a little far-fetched. But certainly, he says, by 2035 Israel will have formally annexed Judea and Samaria – the biblical names for the West Bank – less than an hour’s drive from Amman.

It was along this chain of windswept hilltops that the Bible records God promising the land to Abraham and subsequent patriarchs, leading their people to settle, defend, and worship in that land. Today Rabbi Ben Meir and his wife are among the 400,000 Jews who live in the West Bank, which Israel’s army has occupied since the 1967 war.

The parents of nine, they live in a hilltop community that feels almost like summer camp – except for the highly effective security cordon to guard against nearby Arab villages. Shabbat services begin with the clanking of guns on the synagogue floor – many army officers call this home – while kids scamper down the aisles, as they do the empty streets.

The United Nations has declared such settlements illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention, a post-World War II code that prohibits an occupying power from deporting or transferring its civilians into occupied territory. But their population has tripled since the 1993 Oslo peace agreement.

Finishing off his lunch in Jerusalem’s Old City, Ben Meir maintains that Jews not only have a 3,000-year claim to this land – including Judea and Samaria – but indisputably won it with military victories in 1948 and 1967.

“Why do people expect Israel to give back land to people who were involved in the civil war against us and lost?” asks Ben Meir, who devours American history books in his spare time. “If Hispanics started to say, ‘Return California to Mexico,’ what would you do?”

“The US has to tell the Arab world that … there’s not going to be a Palestinian state, we tried and tried and tried and you guys blew it,” he says.

However, in his vision, local Arabs would be offered permanent residency and equality before the law. This would be followed by investment in Arab infrastructure, employment, and economy, along with close supervision of the educational system “to teach them peace.” Eventually citizenship would be an option for those who forswore violence and accepted that Israel holds exclusive national rights to the land.

But being mightier wouldn’t relieve Israel of moral responsibility, he says. He’d like to see Israelis become more reverent to promote more moral behavior on an individual, family, and national basis, including in their dealings with Arabs.

“I believe that’s what we’re called on to be – a holy nation,” he says.

7 of 12

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.