Real 'Lone Survivor' hero seeks safety in US from Taliban, and he's not alone

The Afghan hero made famous by the 'Lone Survivor' movie is seeking asylum in the United States, as well as thousands of others who supported US troops. 

Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP
From left, Peter Berg, Retired petty officer 1st class Marcus Luttrell and Mark Wahlberg arrive at the 2013 AFI FEST premiere of "Lone Survivor" at the TCL Chinese Theatre on Tuesday, Nov. 12, 2013 in Los Angeles.

Mohammed Gulab, who rose to fame after his heroic actions were captured in the movie ‘Lone Survivor,’ is now seeking asylum from Taliban threats for saving the life of a Navy SEAL.

As depicted in the movie, which stars Mark Wahlberg, Mr. Gulab encountered Navy SEAL officer Marcus Luttrell after he had been shot twice, suffering from internal injuries and other wounds. Rather than leave him to die, Gulab brought Mr. Luttrell back to his village to care for and protect him. The Taliban attacked, and Gulab defended his guest until American forces rescued Luttrell and brought him back to the US.

“I knew I had to help him; to do the right thing, because he was in a lot of danger,” Gulab told CBS, through a translator, in 2013.

But now, Gulab faces deadly repercussions for his involvement in the rescue. Shortly after Luttrell was rescued in 2005, Gulab and his family were forced to flee for their safety. A few years later, he was wounded in a shooting, and the recent closure of the US base nearest his home has heightened his fear. The Taliban continue to threaten his life, including through a publicly posted letter in Pashtu:

“You are informed that your Jewish colleagues and Americans friends are gone now, so who will save you and what will you do? I ordered my commanders and the Taliban Mujahedeens to kill or arrest you alive and bring you to me. Then I will know how your Jewish friends cannot save or protect you.”

On Saturday, January 10, Gulab and his family were relocated to an undisclosed country in hopes of protecting them. They are currently seeking asylum in the US, but are finding that red tape is making the process difficult. Ultimately, the Department of Homeland Security will make the final decision.

Gulab is not the only Afghan in danger for aiding US soldiers. Business Insider reported that 80 percent of Afghan interpreters for US troops are unable to get Special Immigration Visas to come to the US for their years of service. It is estimated that 6,000 former interpreters are stuck in bureaucratic tape. Between fiscal years 2008 and 2012, only 1,051 visas out of 8,500 were awarded to Afghans under the SIV program.

With US forces withdrawing from Afghanistan, those left behind may become prime targets for Taliban revenge. Troops ended their combat role in December to focus on counterterrorism missions and training, assisting, and advising Afghan troops. About 11,000 US troops will remain in Afghanistan in the beginning of 2015, will reduce to 5,500 in 2016, and in 2017 be consolidated to Kabul.

Afghanistan’s president Ashraf Ghani recently told CBS’s "60 Minutes" that the US should “re-examine” its withdrawal from the country. Even if the “war” may be ended, Afghan is still embroiled in conflict and violence, and the president addressed the desire for continued support for the time being.

“If both parties, or, in this case, multiple partners, have done their best to achieve the objectives and progress is very real, then there should be willingness to reexamine a deadline,” President Ghani told CBS interviewer Lara Logan.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.