X-Prize taps the crowd to tackle global education

The goal: Create software so exciting to use that kids will want to teach themselves to read and do math.

Andreea Campeanu/Reuters
Schoolchildren sit under a tree where classes are being held in Leer, Unity State, South Sudan. The classes are taught by volunteer teachers.

The United Nations estimates 58 million children from ages 6 to 11 don’t attend school, a number that has remained stubbornly stagnant since the middle of the last decade.

One nonprofit believes it has the solution: Create software so exciting to use that kids will want to teach themselves.

X-Prize is challenging entrepreneurs to develop open-source software that children can use to acquire basic literacy and arithmetic skills on their own.

"It’s based on the supposition, still unproven, that kids can teach themselves how to read and write," says Matt Keller, director of the Global Learning X-Prize.

The five best submissions will receive $1 million each to test their software in 100 villages in an English-speaking part of sub-Saharan Africa. The best of those five will receive a $10 million prize so long as the software improves learning.

X-Prize has managed a number of similar competitions in the past, including the $30-million Google Lunar X-Prize for private space flight and philanthropist Wendy Schmidt’s $2-million challenge to reduce ocean pollution.

This competition differs from those predecessors in three ways.

First, it addresses education, a new topic for X-Prize.

Second, the $10 million purse comes courtesy of an anonymous donor.

Third, and perhaps most intriguingly, X-Prize will attempt to expand the competition by raising about $3 million through the crowdfunding platform IndieGogo. If the crowdfunding campaign succeeds, the five-team competition phase will include villages in a second yet-to-be-identified country—most likely India.

"We’re not an NGO that thinks we have the solution," says Mr. Keller. "We think the crowd does. So this is tied into our ethic."

Though the Global Learning X-Prize will move forward regardless of crowd participation, Mr. Keller believes future prizes could be completely crowd-funded. That would mark a turn for the organization, which since 1995 has relied on splashy one-time gifts from prominent donors.

The topic of the most recent prize also figures to raise eyebrows. By diving into such a politically fraught cause, the organization will almost certainly confront criticism.

Mr. Keller says X-Prize’s goal is "not to supplant existing school systems but to supplement what’s out there" and that the winning application will mostly serve students who otherwise wouldn’t have had teachers. He hopes developed countries will eventually use the technology to aid overburdened instructors in crowded classrooms.

He says he’s talked to "a lot of teachers" about the idea of self-teaching software, and they’ve all responded with enthusiasm. He has not spoken with any teachers' unions.

Mr. Keller believes the challenge facing applicants is twofold. On the back end, hopefuls will have to program software sophisticated enough to know what its users know and adapt accordingly. Just as crucial, they’ll have to weave that program into an interface compelling enough to compete with the usual distractions of childhood.

"My guess is the team that wins is going to be the team that develops something so sticky, so dynamic, so engaging that kids are enthralled by it," says Mr. Keller. "They’re going to learn in spite of themselves."

This article originally appeared on the website of The Chronicle of Philanthropy.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.