Polystyrene homes aim to take pressure off Kenya's forests

Architects say using EPS is an inexpensive way for Kenyans to own decent homes, and conservationists say it’s also a way for Kenyans to build without cutting down the country's vanishing forests.

Kagondu Njagi/Thomason Reuters Foundation
Adriano Chimoyi, managing director of a housing construction company, describes how expanded polystyrene panels are used to build homes at a construction site in Ruai, a a town on the outskirts of Nairobi.

Were circumstances in his favor, Alfred Kinyua would have been happy to own a stone and mortar house like his neighbor's. But the primary school teacher could not afford the high cost of building materials.

He settled for a three-room house which he built with timber, a trend that conservationists link to a decline in Kenya’s forest cover.

These days however, he is inching closer to his 20-year-old dream, albeit in a green way.

At his spacious compound in Kiereni village, in Upper Eastern Kenya, piles of lean whitish blocks are stacked at the back of his house.

They will keep piling up until Kinyua is satisfied the pile of expanded polystyrene (EPS) panels – a new building technology being promoted in Kenya – is enough to start construction of his new single story home. 

“I buy the panels in bits,” explained Kinyua. “This would not have been possible if I was using [stone] … because one has to buy in bulk.”

While architects describe the EPS technology as a "cheap" way for Kenyans living on the margins to own decent homes, conservationists say it’s also a way for Kenya to continue building without putting undue pressure on its forests.

At Kinyua’s village, elders boast that when they were growing up in the 1980s it was not possible to spot a neighbor roof because of the dense tree cover in the Meru countryside.

But appetite for quality housing meant that some like Kinyua’s neighbor – who owns a mansion – rushed to build comfortable homes at the expense of local ecosystems.

“In less than two decades after independence, there were [lots of] quarries due to mining of [stone],” explained Eustace Kathuni, an elder. “The trees were gone as people chopped them down to build homes.”

These days, the 30-kilometer [17-mile] stretch of road leading to Kathuni’s village is lined with a mix of wooden, stone, and mortar houses, and the village is home to the largest quarry in Eastern Kenya. People say the harvesting of natural resources has led to increasing environmental problems.

“There are a lot of mudslides and landslides due to destruction of the catchment areas,” Kathuni said. “We had very unique monkeys but not anymore because the migratory corridor was destroyed. There are no fish in the rivers while the African love bird has disappeared.”

But a change in building technology could help, its backers say – and could make Kenya’s housing boom greener.

EPS panels are assembled with a polystyrene core encased in a steel wire mesh and lined with fiber cement on both sides, according to Adriano Chimoyi, managing director of a construction company that the National Housing Corporation (NHC) has contracted to roll out green homes.

A bungalow built with the panels takes about 30 days to complete, a third of the time needed to build a stone house, he said – and can be done more cheaply, in part because of the panels are constructed from waste products.

“The technology is made with recycled materials from dumped petroleum products,” Chimoyi said. “It costs about 10 to 15 percent less to build a house with this technology.”

Gitonga Murungi, a conservationist lobbying for the adoption of green homes in Kenya, estimates that homes built with the Italian-developed EPS technology are stronger than houses built with quarry stones, and just as long lasting.

Because of the way blocks are joined, the houses are more earthquake-proof than traditional housing, he said, and the panels are insulating.

“The insulation regulates the temperature in the house,” Gitonga said. “When it is hot outside, it is cool inside the house. When it is cold outside, it is warm inside the house.”

Chimoyi said his company sells a panel home package that also comes with a biogas digester and solar panels to reduce energy costs and further reduce loss of forests to firewood.

A simple one-bedroom house starts at $1,000, including the renewable energy package, he said.

So far, about 30,000 panel houses have been built in Kenya since the technology was launched in 2011, and NHC, a government agency, says it is targeting to roll out about 150,000 housing units every year.

Some, however, question whether such homes are affordable enough in a country where poverty remains widespread.

Achim Steiner, UNEP’s executive director, says it is understandable that a growing number of countries all over the world are keen to phase out the use of wood as a strategy to re-establish their forest ecosystems.

“But at the end of the day the new technologies may not be affordable to many of the struggling poor,” argued Steiner. “Trees actually grow and that is why nature provides livelihoods with a renewable resource called wood and timber.”

To deal with the cost problem, NHC says, it offers 75 percent advance building loans to individuals who are willing to use their land as collateral.

Officials say the agency is weighing the possibility of offering loans as well to organized groups, particularly of youths and women.

• Kagondu Njagi is an environmental writer based in Nairobi.

This article originally appeared at Thomson Reuters Foundation, a source of news, information, and connections for action. It provides programs that trigger change, empower people, and offer concrete solutions.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Polystyrene homes aim to take pressure off Kenya's forests
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today