UN chief Ban Ki-Moon denounces Israeli settlements

While visiting Jerusalem, Ban Ki-Moon condemned Israel's next round of settlements – some 2,500 new homes in east Jerusalem – as a 'clear violation of international law.'

Nir Elias/Reuters
Israel's President Reuven Rivlin (r.) and UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon deliver joint statements to the media in Jerusalem, Oct. 13, 2014. Ban Ki-moon is on a two-day visit to the West Bank, Israel and Gaza.

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon chastised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday over the issue of Jewish settlements and challenged him to show "leadership" and make compromises for peace.

The uncharacteristically harsh language by Ban came during a visit to Jerusalem, where the UN chief denounced Israel's latest construction move as a "clear violation of international law."

Ban was referring to an announcement by the Jerusalem municipality's two weeks ago, which said it had approved plans for the construction of some 2,500 homes in Givat Hamatos. The construction would complete a band of Jewish housing in east Jerusalem and present another obstacle to the Palestinian goal of establishing a capital in the area, which was captured by Israel in the 1967 Mideast war.

"This does not send the right signals, and I urge the government of Israel to reverse these activities," Ban said, standing next to Netanyahu. "The status quo is not tenable. It is clear the sides must return to the negotiation table with the readiness to make the tough but necessary compromises."

Then, turning to his host, Ban added: "This is the time for leadership, Mr. Prime Minister – for the resumption of talks – for an end to polarization. There is not a moment to lose."

Peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians broke down in April and violence followed, reaching its climax in the bloody 50-day war this summer between Israel and Gaza's militant Islamic Hamas rulers.

Ban's call for the resumption of talks comes as Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas is preparing to ask the UN Security Council to set a November 2016 deadline for Israel to withdraw from Palestinian lands occupied in 1967, including east Jerusalem. If the UN bid fails, Abbas has signaled he would pursue war crimes charges against Israel.

Even after the war, tensions between the two sides remain high. On Monday, Israeli police raided a Jerusalem holy site in the morning hours, to thwart what they said was a planned attack by Palestinian rioters.

Israeli spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said police got a tip about a planned violent demonstration and entered the holy site, where they found firebombs and rocks and chased the demonstrators toward the Al-Aqsa mosque, where they barricaded themselves inside.

No one was injured in the brief clash.

The hilltop compound is revered by Jews as the Temple Mount, where the two biblical Jewish Temples stood. It is sacred to Muslims, who refer to it as the Haram as-Sharif, or Noble Sanctuary, marking the place where they believe the Prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven.

The site is the holiest in Judaism and the third holiest in Islam, and a frequent flashpoint for demonstrations.

Ban said he was "deeply concerned by repeated provocations at the Holy Sites in Jerusalem. These only inflame tensions and must stop."

Netanyahu said they were a result of "Palestinian extremists who are instigating violence" by spreading baseless rumors that Israel was threatening Muslim holy places.

The Israeli leader also touched on the Gaza war this summer, saying that its root cause was the incessant rocket fire from Gaza toward Israeli cities. He also charged that "these rocket attacks often exploited UN neutrality, using UN facilities and UNschools as part of the Hamas machine of terror."

"And when rockets were discovered inside UN schools, some UN officials handed them back to Hamas – that very same Hamas that was rocketing Israeli cities and Israeli civilians," Netanyahu said to Ban, who did not respond to the charge.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.