Officials: Firebombing that killed 16 at Cairo nightclub not terrorism

A group of young men threw Molotov cocktails into a restaurant in Cairo after a fight, and the resulting fire killed 16 and raised false suspicions of a terrorist attack in Egypt's capital.

Mohamed Abd El Ghany/Reuters
Plainclothes policemen stand guard in front of the restaurant that was attacked in Cairo, Egypt, Dec. 4. A Molotov cocktail hurled at the Cairo restaurant killed 16 people and wounded two on Friday, Egyptian security officials said.

Masked men firebombed a restaurant in Cairo early Friday, causing a fire that killed 16 people and wounded at least five others.

Egyptian authorities are investigating the firebombing as a crime, not as a terrorist attack. Egypt's government has been battling an insurgency of fighters from political Islamic groups since President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi took power in 2013, but the firebombing resulted from a dispute among workers, rather than terrorist activity, The New York Times reported.

The attackers were a group of young men in masks who threw Molotov cocktails into the building Friday morning. They had visited the El Sayad nightclub that night and not been allowed to enter, and officials say one may have been a vengeful former employee fired by the restaurant, Reuters reports.

El Sayad was a feature of Cairo's central Agouza district, on the banks of the Nile River. It included a nightclub in the basement that stayed open most nights, the AFP reported.

When the young men visited the club Thursday night, a fight broke out and employees refused to let them enter. The masked men returned the next morning to firebomb the club, National Public Radio (NPR) reported.

"A raging fire broke out and smoke billowed from the club before security forces put out the fire," reports NPR. "Authorities say this was not an act of terrorism. Essentially, it was a late night bar fight gone very very wrong."

Many were trapped inside, as a single, narrow exit made escape from the blaze difficult for all and impossible for some. Firefighters did not even try to rescue those trapped in the basement at first because they did not realize people were trapped, BBC reported.

"There was little chance of escape for those inside," Orla Guerin wrote for the BBC. "The narrow blackened entrance way was the only way out."

Mohammed Ali, a local pharmacist, said the fire erupted after the nightclub had closed when only workers would have been there. Mr. Ali thought at first the fire was a terror attack because of the ongoing tensions between Islamist groups and the government, as well as a Russian passenger plane believed to have been bombed by Islamic State on Oct. 31 in the Egyptian Sinai.

Mr. Ali said he realized the attack was only a worker's dispute, albeit a deadly one, after he saw two men flee the scene on motorcycles and remembered them from the nightclub dispute the night before.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.