Japanese whalers fined for hunting in Antarctic waters off Australia

Japan has continued whaling in the Antarctic despite demands from global regulators for evidence that the expeditions have a scientific purpose. 

Sea Shepeherd/JoAnne McArthur/Reuters/File
The new Sea Shepherd icebreaker Bob Barker sails January 6, 2010. The environmental group Sea Shepherd has been attempting to subvert whaling efforts in southern oceans for years.

An Australian court has fined a Japanese firm 1 million Australian dollars ($700,000) for hunting whales near Antarctica.

The fine was issued against Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha, a government-backed whaling company that operates Japan's hunting ships, for repeatedly breaching a 2008 court injunction to stop killing whales inside Australia’s Antarctic whale sanctuary, which extends 200 nautical miles from Australian-declared territory in the Antarctic.

In 2008, the anti-whaling activist group Humane Society International (HSI) successfully took Kyodo to court in Australia, where it was decided the whale hunt was against Australian law. But Japan said Australia has no authority to enforce its domestic laws on the high seas, and Kyodo continued whaling in the protected waters of the Southern Ocean.

For years, environmental groups have used the courts to try to stop Japanese whaling activities.

In 1986, the International Whaling Commission (IWC) put in place a moratorium that banned commercial whaling, but allowed small-scale whale hunts carried out for research purposes. Japan has since maintained that killing about 1,000 whales per year is necessary to research the whales' breeding, migratory, and other habits.

In 2010, Australia filed a case with the International Court of Justice (ICJ), arguing that Japan's Southern Ocean whale hunt is commercial whaling under the guise of scientific research.  

In a major victory for Australia and environmental groups, the world court ruled that Japan’s "scientific" whaling was indeed illegal under international law and must end.

After the ruling, Japan canceled its 2014-2015 Antarctic hunt. But in June 2014, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said, "While respecting international law and scientific facts, it is necessary to continue the scientific whaling to get data needed on stocks in order to properly manage cetacean resources, so that it is then possible to look into restarting commercial whaling."

This June, Japan announced plans to resume whaling in the Antarctic this year, with a goal of catching 333 minke whales annually between 2015 and 2027.

Japan makes no secret of the fact that meat from whales – nominally killed for research – is processed into food and sold. Japan claims that eating whale is a local tradition.

"It is a pity that that part of Japanese culture is not understood by the international community," Abe told a parliamentary committee in June 2014.

Critics of Japan's whale research program hope the Australian government will use Wednesday’s ruling to intensify diplomatic efforts to ensure Japan doesn’t resume whaling in the Southern Ocean.

"If whaling in Antarctic waters does resume this year, as we fear it will, and Kyodo continues to ignore the injunction, we ask that the Australian government raises this with the Japanese government to ensure that Australian laws for the protection of whales are observed," HSI’s Australia director, Michael Kennedy, told the Guardian.

"The onus for stopping Japan from returning to Antarctica to slaughter whales this year now lies directly with the Australian government," said Jeff Hansen, managing director of anti-whaling group Sea Shepherd.

Material from The Associated Press was used in this report.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Japanese whalers fined for hunting in Antarctic waters off Australia
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today