Has Syria become a Russian-American proxy war?

While President Obama has repeatedly dismissed the idea of a proxy war in Syria, experts are divided on whether that is already happening.

Alexander Kots/Komsomolskaya Pravda/AP
Smoke rises after shelling by the Syrian army in Jobar, Damascus, Syria on Oct. 14. Backed by Russian airstrikes, the Syrian army has launched an offensive in central and northwestern regions.

Russia said Thursday that it would reduce the frequency of airstrikes in Syria as government forces on the ground move to cover the changing front lines of the Islamic State.

The announcement comes just days after rebel forces said that they had been supplied with American-made TOW anti-tank missiles, stoking fears that the United States is increasing its role in the years-long Syrian conflict that now includes Russia.

These 500 or so missiles have a range of 2.6 miles and "have been employed to deadly effect against the regime forces," reports The Christian Science Monitor’s Nicholas Blanford.

As the increasingly well-armed rebels continue to fight the Russian-backed government regime, "the Syrian conflict is edging closer to an all-out proxy war between the United States and Russia," wrote The New York Times on Tuesday.

President Obama has repeatedly dismissed the idea of a proxy war in Syria.

"We’re not going to make Syria into a proxy war between the United States and Russia," he said at an Oct. 2 press conference. "This is not some superpower chessboard contest.  And anybody who frames it in that way isn’t paying very close attention to what’s been happening on the chessboard."

But not all experts agree with him. Some of the debate comes down to semantics.

Stephen D. Biddle, an adjunct senior fellow for defense policy at the Council on Foreign Relations, told NPR that he defines a "proxy war" as "as an outside actor advancing an agenda by using local fighters."

By that definition, "the simple answer would be yes," he said. "But it's also incomplete, because there are lots of proxy wars going on in Syria. And it's not clear that the one between Russia and the United States is the most important."

John McLaughlin, a practitioner-in-residence at Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, told NPR he doesn’t see the conflict as a proxy war – yet.

"But the situation is very fluid and could move in that direction," he said.

Another expert warned that "the term 'proxy war' overstates US-Russian strains over Syria."

Even with American-made missiles, "the US has not, and I don't think will, actively oppose the Russian move," wrote Cliff Kupchan, chairman of the global risk analysis firm Eurasia Group. "US strategy is not proxy war, but to let President Vladimir Putin dig his own hole in the morass that is the Syrian civil war."

Some critics also say that Russian intervention is less about fighting the US than wooing regional allies.

"That Vladimir Putin is out to save Syrian President Bashar al-Assad seems to be of little doubt," writes the Monitor’s Howard LaFranchi on Wednesday. "But increasingly, it appears the Russian leader is intent on making a broader point through his muscular military intervention in the Syrian conflict, and it has to do at least in part with the United States."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.