Is our outrage over Cecil the Lion going too far?

Contrary to reports, Jericho, the 'coalition partner' of Cecil, the beloved lion killed by a Minnesota dentist last month, is alive and well. But is our concern for certain named lions turning into hysteria?

Paula French via AP
In this image taken from a November 2012 video made available by Paula French, a well-known, protected lion known as Cecil strolls around in Zimbabwe's Hwange National Park. Zimbabwe's wildlife minister says extradition is being sought for Walter Palmer, the American dentist who shot and killed Cecil.

The shooting of Zimbabwe’s beloved Cecil the Lion last month sparked international outcry, with many commenters saying that the hunter responsible, a Minnesota dentist, should be tried in court. One celebrity even went as far as to publish his home address.

Has it gone too far?

Twitter users have expressed their opinions with the hashtag #CecilTheLion, or, more provocatively, #CatLivesMatter. Some have called the hunter a “coward” with a “very small ego” and others have even tweeted about throwing him into a den of lions.

Dr. Walter J. Palmer, an American hunter and dentist known for his interest in big game, allegedly paid around $54,000 to hunt the lion, the Telegraph reported. And in a personal statement he claims that he did not know the hunt was illegal.

“I had no idea that the lion I took was a known, local favorite, was collared and part of a study until the end of the hunt. I relied on the expertise of my local professional guides to ensure a legal hunt,” he said.

A petition intended for the president of Zimbabwe had over one million signatures as of Sunday morning. It calls for “justice” for Dr. Palmer and an end to hunting permits that allow the killing of endangered animals. And remarks by Ingrid Newkirk, president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), became particularly controversial when Newkirk expressed her desire that Palmer be put to death.  

“Hunting is a coward’s past time. If, as has been reported, this dentist and his guides lured Cecil out of the park with food so as to shoot him on private property, because shooting him in the park would have been illegal, he needs to extradited, charged, and, preferably, hanged,” she wrote.

All of this came to a head when news outlets began reporting that Jericho, another important lion in the park, was also dead. On Saturday, the Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force (ZCTF) said, “it is with huge disgust and sadness that we have just been informed that Jericho, Cecil’s brother has been killed at 4pm today” in a Facebook post

As it turns out, Jericho is not Cecil’s brother, but a “coalition partner,” as the Associated Press reported. And, according to the same report, Jericho is very much alive.  

Activists of various political stripes have expressed their concern about the wide global attention the lion issue is receiving. "Black Lives Matter" activists say that Cecil has received more attention than Sandra Bland – a woman who died in prison by alleged suicide. And some conservatives are concerned that the Cecil story has undermined the recent Planned Parenthood scandal.

A New York Times report suggests that the outrage over the killing may stem from the fact that Cecil had been given a name.  Of the 600 lions killed every year by tourists – out of a total population of 20,000 – very few of them have names.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.