World Humanitarian Day: 5 crises and how you can help

Here are five of the world’s worst humanitarian crises in 2013 – and what you can do to help. 

Mali

Thomas Martinez/AP
A woman completes her ballot behind a privacy screen as others wait in line to vote, at a polling station in Bamako, Mali, Sunday, Aug. 11, 2013.

Earlier this month, Malians went to the polls to elect a new president, eager to bring an end to more than a year of violent political instability that began when the country’s former leader, Amadou Toumani Touré, was overthrown in a coup in March 2012. The violence that followed Mr. Touré’s unseating splintered the country along religious and ethnic lines, and eventually prompted an international intervention led by French forces in early 2013. But as the fighting slowed, the scope of the humanitarian crisis it left behind became apparent. 

Between March 2012 and March 2013, some 430,000 people were displaced by the violence, and 170,000 fled the country altogether. Continued scattered violence and unexploded landmines have kept most from returning. Fighting has also disrupted the provision of humanitarian aid. In April 2012, for instance, rebel forces forced the UN’s World Food Programme to temporarily suspend several of its operations in Mali after warehouses were looted and hundreds of tons of food stolen.

Both the violence and the refugee crisis in Mali are centered far from the capital of Bamako, in the country’s windswept and impoverished north, where infrastructure, health care, and education were decrepit even before the war began. Much of what was there was destroyed in the fighting. Meanwhile, a drought hit the country in late 2012, putting more than a million people at risk for malnutrition and starvation.

To help:

Mali’s crisis drew massive international attention when it began in 2012, but since then, donor fatigue has set in. The International Business Times reported that 30 percent of aid need went unmet in the country last year, and to date this year only 34 percent of the aid appealed for has been funded.

Major aid organizations urgently seeking donations for their operations in Mali include the UN World Food ProgrammeOxfam, and World Vision.

2 of 5

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.